Salhuana v. Diamond Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 258

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE re 241 Order, 236 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,, (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

IN RE DIAMOND FOODS, INC.,
SECURITIES LITIGATION.

12

This Document Relates to:

13

All Actions.

14

No. C 11-05386 WHA

ORDER RE DISCOVERY
DISPUTE
/

15
16

Counsel for plaintiff Mississippi Public Employees’ Retirement System has filed a letter

17

stating that its discovery motion, filed on May 24, has been mooted and that no further relief is

18

necessary regarding that motion. Accordingly, as the motion has been resolved, all deadlines

19

associated with the motion are VACATED (see Dkt. No. 241).

20

As stated in the order dated June 10 (Dkt. No. 249), plaintiff’s motion to file portions of

21

the discovery motion under seal was denied because the designating party failed to file a

22

responsive declaration. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(d), the document or proposed filing will be

23

made part of the public record.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: June 13, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE