Granfield v. NVIDIA Corporation

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING filed by Nvidia Corporation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/2/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)

RT

8

es Ware

m
Judge Ja

ER

H

9

R NIA

I

NO

7

Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA CORPORATION

ERED

10

FO

6

ORD
T IS SO

LI

5

RT
U
O

4

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

3

S

2

ROBERT P. VARIAN (STATE BAR NO. 107459)
[e-mail]
JUSTIN M. LICHTERMAN (STATE BAR NO. 225734)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

UNIT
ED

1

N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15

MONICA GRANFIELD, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situate,

16

Plaintiff,

17
18

Case No. 3:11-cv-05403-JW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

v.
NVIDIA Corporation,
Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-05403-JW
OHSWEST:261526689.1

1

WHEREAS, on December 13, 2011, the Court entered an Order extending

2

defendant NVIDIA Corporation’s time to respond to the First Amended Complaint in the above-

3

captioned action until January 30, 2012;

4

WHEREAS, lead counsel for Defendant, Robert P. Varian, has been on business

5

travel over the past week, and the parties have met and conferred and agreed that NVIDIA’s time

6

to respond to the First Amended Complaint shall be extended by one week until February 6,

7

2012;

8
9
10

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Plaintiff and
Defendant, through their counsel of record, that NVIDIA shall respond to the current complaint
on February 6, 2012, subject to the Court’s approval.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1OHSWEST:261526689.1

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-05403-JW

1

Dated: January 30, 2012

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Justin M. Lichterman

4

Justin M. Lichterman, Bar No. 225734
[e-mail]
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:[phone]

5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA Corporation

10
11

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER AND KOLBE
LLP

12
13

By: /s/ Dustin Schubert
Dustin Schubert
[e-mail]
Schubert Jonckheer and Kolbe LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the
Putative Class

19
20
21
22

I, Justin M. Lichterman, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used
to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time To File Amended Complaint. In
compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Robert Schubert has concurred in
this filing.

23
24

It is so ORDERED.

25
26

February 2, 2012
DATED: _______________________
THE HONORABLE JAMES WARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28

-2OHSWEST:261526689.1

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-05403-JW