Granfield v. NVIDIA Corporation

Filing 58

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 46 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 20, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NO. C 11-05403 JW Monica Granfield, 11 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 NVIDIA Corp., 13 Defendant. 14 / 15 Presently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation regarding the hearing on 16 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (See Docket Item No. 57.) In their Joint Stipulation, the parties 17 request that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, which is currently scheduled for June 25, 18 2012, be moved to August of 2012 due to conflicts with counsel’s schedule. (Id.) 19 Upon review, the Court finds it appropriate to take Defendant’s Motion under submission 20 without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the June 25 21 hearing. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 20, 2012 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Alexander K Talarides atalarides@orrick.com Dustin Lamm Schubert dschubert@schubertlawfirm.com Edward F. Haber ehaber@shulaw.com Ian J. McLoughlin imcloughlin@shulaw.com Jason A. Pikler jpikler@schubertlawfirm.com Justin M. Lichterman jlichterman@orrick.com Michelle H. Blauner mblauner@shulaw.com Robert P. Varian rvarian@orrick.com Virginia Hope Johnson vjohnson@princelobel.com Willem F. Jonckheer wjonckheer@schubertlawfirm.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: June 20, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 11 By: For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ JW Chambers William Noble Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?