Granfield v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filing
58
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 46 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 20, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 11-05403 JW
Monica Granfield,
11
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
NVIDIA Corp.,
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
Presently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Stipulation regarding the hearing on
16
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (See Docket Item No. 57.) In their Joint Stipulation, the parties
17
request that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, which is currently scheduled for June 25,
18
2012, be moved to August of 2012 due to conflicts with counsel’s schedule. (Id.)
19
Upon review, the Court finds it appropriate to take Defendant’s Motion under submission
20
without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the June 25
21
hearing.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 20, 2012
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2
Alexander K Talarides atalarides@orrick.com
Dustin Lamm Schubert dschubert@schubertlawfirm.com
Edward F. Haber ehaber@shulaw.com
Ian J. McLoughlin imcloughlin@shulaw.com
Jason A. Pikler jpikler@schubertlawfirm.com
Justin M. Lichterman jlichterman@orrick.com
Michelle H. Blauner mblauner@shulaw.com
Robert P. Varian rvarian@orrick.com
Virginia Hope Johnson vjohnson@princelobel.com
Willem F. Jonckheer wjonckheer@schubertlawfirm.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Dated: June 20, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
11
By:
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ JW Chambers
William Noble
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?