High v. The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc. et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 13 Stipulation filed by Jackie L. High, Mepco Finance Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/19/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)

1 THE MEHDI FIRM
AZRA Z. MEHDI (220406)
2 One Market
Spear Tower, Suite 3600
3 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
4 Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
5
Counsel for Plaintiff
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)
)
9
)
)
10
)
11 JACKIE L. HIGH, Individually and on Behalf )
of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
)
12
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
13
)
)
14 THE CHOICE MANUFACTURING
COMPANY, INC., MEPCO FINANCE
)
)
15 CORPORATION, and DOES 3 through 20,
inclusive,
)
)
16
)
Defendants.
)
17
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 4:11-CV-05478-LB

EMC

CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2011, plaintiff Jackie L. High filed a complaint for
violation of California Business & Professions Code Sections 17200 and 17500, et seq.; Breach
of Contract and the Covenant of Good Faith & Fair Dealing; and breach of Express Warranty
against The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Choice Manufacturing”) and MEPCO
Finance Corporation (“MEPCO”), captioned High v. The Choice Manufacturing Company, Inc.,
et al., Case No. CV-11-05478-LB;
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2011 counsel for plaintiff and defendant MEPCO agreed to
an extension until December 16, 2011 for MEPCO to answer or otherwise respond to the
complaint;
WHEREAS on December 15, 2011, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a);
WHEREAS plaintiff is amenable to granting defendant MEPCO additional time in which
to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint;
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between undersigned counsel for the
parties, that Defendant MEPCO shall have until January 11, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond
to the Amended Complaint.
DATED: December 15, 2011

19

/s/
AZRA Z. MEHDI
One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 3600
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Jackie L. High

20
21
22
23
24
25

THE MEHDI FIRM

DATED: December 15, 2011

DOWNEY BRAND

26

/s/
JAMIE DREHER

27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Case No. 4:11-CV-05478-LB

1

621 Capital Mall, 18th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant MEPCO Finance
Corporation

2
3
4
5

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation.

6
By:

8

***

9

S

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

17
18
19

Submitted by:
THE MEHDI FIRM
AZRA Z. MEHDI (220406)

FO

LI

ER

H

16

RT

14
15

_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE LAUREL BEELER . Chen
dward M
Judge E
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DISTRICT

NO

13

12/19/11
DATED: _____________________

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

A

12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

10

/s/
AZRA Z. MEHDI

R NIA

Dated: December 15, 2011

UNIT
ED

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

___________/s/____________
AZRA Z. MEHDI

22

One Market
Spear Tower, Suite 3600
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

23

Counsel for Plaintiff

20
21

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

2

Case No. 4:11-CV-05478-LB