A10 Networks Inc v. Brocade Communications Systems Inc et al

Filing 40

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED. CV11-05493 not related to CV11-05458. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 11/30/2011. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California
Corporation,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

v.
F5 NETWORKS, INC., a Washington
Corporation,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: C 11-5458 PSG
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES
SHOULD BE RELATED
(Re: Docket No. 8)

Defendant.

14
15

Having considered the papers regarding Plaintiff A10 Networks, Inc.’s administrative

16
motion to consider whether A10 Networks Systems, Inc. v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
17
18

(Case No. 11-5493-WHA) should be related to the current case, and finding good cause therefor,
The court DENIES the motion.1 “[T]he undersigned judge would be willing to coordinate

19
20

certain claim construction issues (and those issues only) if the parties so stipulate, the assigned

21

judges consent, and the parties make a showing that the same phrases in the same claims require

22

interpretation.”2

23
24

Dated: 11/30/2011
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27

1

Cf. EIT Holdings LLC v. Yelp!, Inc., et al., Case No. 10-5623 (WHA), Docket No. 86 at 4.

28

2

Id.
1

Case No.: C 11-5458 PSG
ORDER