Campbell et al v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 69 FOR NEW SCHEDULING ORDER. Pretrial Conference set for 2/10/2014 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 2/24/2014 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 2/24/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/28/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
1
4
RACHEL LEDERMAN, SBN 130192
Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach,
Attorneys at Law
558 Capp Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 282-9300; fax (415) 285-5066
rlederman@2momslaw.com
5
and additional counsel listed on pleadings
6
Attorneys for plaintiffs Timothy Scott
Campbell et al.
2
3
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY SCOTT
CAMPBELL, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
No. CV11-05498 RS
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A NEW
SCHEDULING ORDER; AND PROPOSED
ORDER
vs.
14
15
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.
Complaint Filed: Nov. 14, 2011
Current Trial Date: May 28, 2013
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Whereas, the parties have agreed to participate in settlement discussions to see if
the matter can be resolved without naming additional defendants, and have agreed to a
limited discovery plan to facilitate such settlement discussions, and Magistrate Judge
Beeler has set a further settlement conference for November 13, 2012;
Whereas, the parties agree, and Judge Beeler recommends, to continue the trial
date and extend deadlines to allow sufficient time for the settlement process;
THEREFORE, the parties through their respective counsel jointly request that the
court issue a new scheduling order setting the following dates and deadlines:
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A NEW SCHEDULING ORDER
CAMPBELL, ET AL. V. CITY OF OAKLAND, CASE NO. CV11-05498 RS
1
1
1.
2
AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS: The parties shall complete amendments to the
pleadings by April 1, 2013.
3
2.
DISCOVERY: On or before September 6, 2013, all non-expert discovery shall be
4
completed by the parties.
5
3.
6
shall proceed as follows:
EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions
7
A. On or before September 20, 2013, plaintiffs shall disclose expert testimony
8
reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
9
B. On or before October 4, 2013, defendants shall disclose expert testimony and
10
reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
11
C. On or before October 28, 2013, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to
12
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
13
4.
14
Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than December 12, 2013.
15
5.
16
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. Counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement on or
before January 27, 2014.
17
6.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. February 10, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.
18
7.
TRIAL DATE. February 24, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.
19
The parties further stipulate to toll, from the date of this agreement until April 1,
20
2013, applicable limitations on California state law claims provided in Cal. Government
21
Code sections 945.6, 950.6 and related provisions, both as to the named plaintiffs, and as
22
to the other claimants who have presented administrative claims against the City of
23
Oakland and have made settlement demands as part of the settlement process in this case,
24
but who have not yet been named as plaintiffs in the within action: Max Bell Alper,
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A NEW SCHEDULING ORDER
CAMPBELL, ET AL. V. CITY OF OAKLAND, CASE NO. CV11-05498 RS
2
1
Brooke Anderson, Kevin Christensen, Mathias Bernarding, Mara Randle, Sukay Sow,
2
Max Stiers, Ruben Mendez, David Morse, Dereck Clemons, Scott Whitacre, and Suzi
3
Spangenberg.
4
5
It is so stipulated.
Dated: September 27, 2012
6
/S/
Rachel Lederman
Attorneys for plaintiffs T. Scott Campbell, et al.
7
/S/
8
Linda Lye
Attorneys for plaintiffs ACLU-NC, et al.
9
10
/S/
11
William Simmons, Supervising City Attorney
Attorney for defendants
12
13
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
14
I am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file
15
this stipulated request. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that
16
Ms. Lye and Mr. Simmons have concurred in this filing.
17
18
Dated: September 27, 2012
/S/
Rachel Lederman
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A NEW SCHEDULING ORDER
CAMPBELL, ET AL. V. CITY OF OAKLAND, CASE NO. CV11-05498 RS
3
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing, the court vacates the current
3
trial date of May 28, 2013, and sets the following new schedule:
4
1.
5
AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS: The parties shall complete amendments to the
pleadings by April 1, 2013.
6
2.
DISCOVERY: On or before September 6, 2013, all non-expert discovery shall be
7
completed by the parties.
8
3.
9
shall proceed as follows:
EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions
10
A. On or before September 20, 2013, plaintiffs shall disclose expert testimony
11
reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
12
B. On or before October 4, 2013, defendants shall disclose expert testimony and
13
reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
14
C. On or before October 28, 2013, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to
15
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
16
4.
17
Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than December 12, 2013.
18
5.
19
20
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. Counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement on or
before January 27, 2014.
6.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The pretrial conference will be held on February
21
10, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450
22
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
23
24
7.
TRIAL DATE. Trial shall commence on February 24, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., in
Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A NEW SCHEDULING ORDER
CAMPBELL, ET AL. V. CITY OF OAKLAND, CASE NO. CV11-05498 RS
4
1
Francisco, California.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
9/28/12
Dated: _________________
____________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A NEW SCHEDULING ORDER
CAMPBELL, ET AL. V. CITY OF OAKLAND, CASE NO. CV11-05498 RS
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?