Lewis v. Safelite Fulfillment Inc.

Filing 5

ORDER granting re 4 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Safelite Fulfillment Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/6/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011) Modified on 12/6/2011 (ahm, COURT STAFF).

1 Brent M. Giddens, State Bar No. 133652
Kent J. Sprinkle, State Bar No. 226971
2 Kimberly M. Foster, State Bar No. 243216
CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER
3 601 Montgomery Street
Suite 350
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
6
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC.

LLP

9 Robert A. Harris, Ohio Registration No. 0059549
(pro hac vice application forthcoming)
10 VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP
52 East Gay Street
11 Columbus, OH 43215
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
13
Attorneys for Defendant
14 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC.
15 Gregory N. Karasik, State Bar No. 115834
KARASIK LAW FIRM
16 11835 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 1275
Los Angeles, CA 90064
17 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
18 Email: [e-mail]

Alexander I. Dychter, State Bar No. 234526
DYCHTER LAW OFFICES, APC
625 Broadway, Suite 600
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

19 Attorneys for PlaintiffDEMETRIOT

Attorneys for PlaintiffDEMETRIOT

K. LEWIS

K. LEWIS

20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
DEMETRIOT K. LEWIS, individually and on
23 behalf of others similarly situated,

Case No. CV-II-5512

24

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

25
26
27
28

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC.; and DOES 1 )
through 10,
)
)
Defendant.
)

Action Filed:

JSC

November 14, 2011

11---------------)

Case No. CV-1l-5512 JSC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: RESPONSIVE PLEADING
450087.1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, Plaintiff

2 DEMETRIOT K. LEWIS ("Plaintiff') and Defendant SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC.
3 ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, that pursuant
4 to USDC Local Civil Rule, Rule 6-1, Defendant shall have a 45 day extension of time in which to
5 file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff s Complaint for FLSA Collective Action and Rule 23 Class
6 Action. Accordingly, Defendant's responsive pleading will now be due January 20,2012.

In

7 exchange for the extension of time, Defendant has agreed to toll the running of the FLSA statute
8 limitations period for the period of time in which Defendant has to file its responsive pleading.
9

In accordance with N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, Section X, the filer of this document

10 hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other
11 signatory hereto.
12
Dated: December 6,2011

CAROTHERS DiSANTE & FREUDENBERGER

LLP

13
14

By: lSI - Kent J. Sprinkle
Kent J. Sprinkle
Attorneys for Defendant SAFELITE FULLMENT, INC.

15
16
Dated: December 6,2011

KARASIK LAW FIRM

17
18

By: lSI - Gregory N. Karasik
Gregory N. Karasik
Attorneys for PlaintiffDEMETRIOT K. LEWIS

19
20

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
Pursuant to USDC Local Civil Rule, Rule 6-1, Defendant shall have a 45 day extension of
22
time in which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff s Complaint for FLSA Collective Action and
23
Rule 23 Class Action. The FLSA statute limitations period is hereby tolled for the period of time
24
in which Defendant has to file its responsive pleading.
25
26
Dated: December _,2011
6
27

Hon. Jacqueline S. Corley
Magistrate Judge, United States District Court
Northern District of California

28

1
450087.1

Case No. CV-1l-5512 JSC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: RESPONSIVE PLEADING