Putzmeister America, Inc. v. United Equipment Sales, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Response to First Amended Complaint filed by Richard Hibbard, UES Company, Inc.. First Amended Complaint on behalf of UES Co. due by 5/18/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/27/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)

Case3:11-cv-05575-CRB Document25 Filed04/26/12 Page1 of 3

1 JEFFREY E. FAUCETTE (No. 193066)
JASON M. SKAGGS (No. 202190)
2 SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
5 E-mail: [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD HIBBARD
and UES COMPANY, INC.
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16

PUTZMEISTER AMERICA, INC., a
17 Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

18
19 v.

Case No.: 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE RESPONSE TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

20 UNITED EQUIPMENT SALES, INC., an
Oregon corporation in dissolution, UES
21 COMPANY, INC., an Oregon corporation,
and RICHARD HIBBARD, an individual,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FAC: CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)

Case3:11-cv-05575-CRB Document25 Filed04/26/12 Page2 of 3

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned counsel for

2 Plaintiff Putzmeister America, Inc. and Defendants Richard Hibbard and UES Company, Inc. as
3 follows:
4

a.

The undersigned counsel for Defendants shall accept service of Plaintiff

5

Putzmeister America, Inc.’s First Amended Complaint on behalf of UES

6

Company, Inc.

7

b.

Defendants Richard Hibbard and UES Company, Inc.’s responses to

8

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint shall be due to be filed on or before

9

May 18, 2012.

10
11

Dated: April 26, 2012

SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP

12
By:

15

/s/
Jeffrey E. Faucette
Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD HIBBARD and
UES COMPANY, INC.

16 Dated: April 26, 2012

CARR & FERRELL LLP

13
14

17
18

By:

/s/
Robert J. Yorio
Attorneys for Plaintiff PUTZMEISTER AMERICA,
INC.

21

S DISTRICT

S

25

ERED

r
Hon. Charlesles R. Breye
r R. Breyer
ge ChaDistrict Judge
Ju
UniteddStates

RT

27

NO

26

I

ORD
T IS SO

28
2

A

H

ER

LI

24

UNIT
ED

April 27
23 Dated: ______________, 2012

C

RT
U
O

E
22 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. T
A
T

R NIA

20

FO

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FAC: CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)

C