Putzmeister America, Inc. v. United Equipment Sales, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Response to First Amended Complaint and Initial Case Management Conference filed by Richard Hibbard, UES Company, Inc.. Response to FAC due 7/31/2012. Case Management Conference set for 8/24/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/18/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2012)

Case3:11-cv-05575-CRB Document32 Filed07/12/12 Page1 of 2

1 JEFFREY E. FAUCETTE (No. 193066)
JASON M. SKAGGS (No. 202190)
2 SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
5 E-mail: [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD HIBBARD
and UES COMPANY, INC.
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16

PUTZMEISTER AMERICA, INC., a
17 Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

18
19 v.

Case No.: 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE RESPONSE TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

20 UNITED EQUIPMENT SALES, INC., an
Oregon corporation in dissolution, UES
21 COMPANY, INC., an Oregon corporation,
and RICHARD HIBBARD, an individual,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FAC: CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)

Case3:11-cv-05575-CRB Document32 Filed07/12/12 Page2 of 2

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned counsel for

2 Plaintiff Putzmeister America, Inc. and Defendants Richard Hibbard and UES Company, Inc. as
3 follows:
4

a.

Defendants Richard Hibbard and UES Company, Inc.’s responses to

5

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint shall be due to be filed on or before

6

July 31, 2012.

7

b.

8

24
The initial case management conference shall be set for August 17, 2012 at

8:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court’s calendar permits.

9
10

Dated: July 12, 2012

SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP

11
By:

14

/s/
Jeffrey E. Faucette
Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD HIBBARD and
UES COMPANY, INC.

15 Dated: July 12, 2012

CARR & FERRELL LLP

12
13

16
17

By:

/s/
Robert J. Yorio
Attorneys for Plaintiff PUTZMEISTER AMERICA,
INC.

18
19
20

21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 18
22 Dated: ______________, 2012

UNIT
ED

RT

28

ER

H

2

er

R. Brey

LI

harles
Judge C

NO

27

A

26

R NIA

D

Hon. Charles R. Breyer ERE
O ORD
IT IS S
United States District Judge

25

FO

24

RT
U
O

S

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
IS T RIC T O

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FAC: CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)
D

C