Putzmeister America, Inc. v. United Equipment Sales, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Response to First Amended Complaint and Initial Case Management Conference filed by Richard Hibbard, UES Company, Inc.. Response to FAC due 7/31/2012. Case Management Conference set for 8/24/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/18/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2012)
Case3:11-cv-05575-CRB Document32 Filed07/12/12 Page1 of 2
1 JEFFREY E. FAUCETTE (No. 193066)
JASON M. SKAGGS (No. 202190)
2 SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 315-1669
4 Facsimile: (415) 433-5994
E-mail: jeff@skaggsfaucette.com
5 E-mail: jason@skaggsfaucette.com
6 Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD HIBBARD
and UES COMPANY, INC.
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
PUTZMEISTER AMERICA, INC., a
17 Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
18
19 v.
Case No.: 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE RESPONSE TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
20 UNITED EQUIPMENT SALES, INC., an
Oregon corporation in dissolution, UES
21 COMPANY, INC., an Oregon corporation,
and RICHARD HIBBARD, an individual,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FAC: CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)
Case3:11-cv-05575-CRB Document32 Filed07/12/12 Page2 of 2
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned counsel for
2 Plaintiff Putzmeister America, Inc. and Defendants Richard Hibbard and UES Company, Inc. as
3 follows:
4
a.
Defendants Richard Hibbard and UES Company, Inc.’s responses to
5
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint shall be due to be filed on or before
6
July 31, 2012.
7
b.
8
24
The initial case management conference shall be set for August 17, 2012 at
8:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court’s calendar permits.
9
10
Dated: July 12, 2012
SKAGGS FAUCETTE LLP
11
By:
14
/s/
Jeffrey E. Faucette
Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD HIBBARD and
UES COMPANY, INC.
15 Dated: July 12, 2012
CARR & FERRELL LLP
12
13
16
17
By:
/s/
Robert J. Yorio
Attorneys for Plaintiff PUTZMEISTER AMERICA,
INC.
18
19
20
21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 18
22 Dated: ______________, 2012
UNIT
ED
RT
28
ER
H
2
er
R. Brey
LI
harles
Judge C
NO
27
A
26
R NIA
D
Hon. Charles R. Breyer ERE
O ORD
IT IS S
United States District Judge
25
FO
24
RT
U
O
S
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
IS T RIC T O
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FAC: CASE NO. 3:11-cv-5575 (CRB)
D
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?