Trevino v. Martel et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)

Case3:11-cv-05622-CRB Document21 Filed05/15/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

DANIEL TREVINO,

C 11-5622 CRB (PR)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
DISPOSITIVE MOTION

v.
M. MARTEL, Warden , et al.,

Defendants.

18
19
20

Defendants Cullen, Foss, Martel, Nollette, Sanders-Johnson, Van Blarcom, and Williams

21

move for a fifty-five-day extension of time, up to and including July 19, 2012, in which to file a

22

dispositive motion. The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion and the

23

accompanying declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing,

24

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ requested extension of time is GRANTED. The time in

25

which Defendants may file a dispositive motion is extended up to and including July 19, 2012.

26

Within thirty days after the dispositive motion is filed, Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve

27

on Defendants’ counsel his opposition to the motion.

28
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. EOT File Dispositive Mot. (C 11-5622 CRB (PR))

Case3:11-cv-05622-CRB Document21 Filed05/15/12 Page2 of 2

S

8

SF2012203871
20609882.doc

ER

H

7

yer
____________________________________________
s R. Bre
e Charle CHARLES R. BREYER
THE HONORABLE
Judg
United States District Judge

RT

6

R NIA

Dated: _May 21, 2012

NO

5

FO

4

LI

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

3

opposition is filed.

TA

RT
U
O

2

DISTRI

S
CT
Defendants shall file a reply brief to plaintiff’s opposition within fifteen days after the
TE
C

UNIT
ED

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. EOT File Dispositive Mot. (C 11-5622 CRB (PR))