Trevino v. Martel et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-05622-CRB Document21 Filed05/15/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DANIEL TREVINO, C 11-5622 CRB (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION v. M. MARTEL, Warden , et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 Defendants Cullen, Foss, Martel, Nollette, Sanders-Johnson, Van Blarcom, and Williams 21 move for a fifty-five-day extension of time, up to and including July 19, 2012, in which to file a 22 dispositive motion. The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion and the 23 accompanying declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing, 24 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ requested extension of time is GRANTED. The time in 25 which Defendants may file a dispositive motion is extended up to and including July 19, 2012. 26 Within thirty days after the dispositive motion is filed, Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve 27 on Defendants’ counsel his opposition to the motion. 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. EOT File Dispositive Mot. (C 11-5622 CRB (PR)) Case3:11-cv-05622-CRB Document21 Filed05/15/12 Page2 of 2 S 8 SF2012203871 20609882.doc ER H 7 yer ____________________________________________ s R. Bre e Charle CHARLES R. BREYER THE HONORABLE Judg United States District Judge RT 6 R NIA Dated: _May 21, 2012 NO 5 FO 4 LI IT IS SO ORDERED. A 3 opposition is filed. TA RT U O 2 DISTRI S CT Defendants shall file a reply brief to plaintiff’s opposition within fifteen days after the TE C UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Mot. EOT File Dispositive Mot. (C 11-5622 CRB (PR))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?