Bank of New York Mellon Corporation False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/14/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Email: david.balabanian@bingham.com
Telephone: 415.393.2000
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS &
FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
David L. Schwarz (SBN 206257)
Sumner Square
1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
Email: dschwarz@khhte.com
Telephone: 202.326.7900
Facsimile: 202.326.7999
Attorneys for Defendant
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORPORATION
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
In re BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORPORATION FALSE CLAIMS ACT
FOREIGN EXCHANGE LITIGATION, Ex rel.
FX ANALYTICS,
No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
A/74624080.2
Case No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and
2
agree to extend the time within which Defendant may plead, move or otherwise respond to the
3
Second Amended Complaint as follows:
4
1.
On or before December 27, 2011, the Plaintiff/Relator and the Intervenors
5
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) may: (1) move to remand this action to state court in whole or in part,
6
(2) file a further amended complaint(s), or (3) take none of these actions.
7
2.
If Plaintiffs neither move to remand nor file a further amended complaint,
8
Defendant shall have until January 23, 2012 to plead, move or otherwise respond to the Second
9
Amended Complaint currently on file in this action.
10
11
3.
If Plaintiffs move to remand, Defendant shall have until January 23, 2012
to oppose such motion.
12
4.
If a motion to remand is made and denied, Plaintiffs may amend the
13
present complaint within 15 days of the Court’s ruling denying the motion to remand. If no
14
Plaintiff elects to amend, Defendant shall plead, move, or otherwise respond to the Second
15
Amended Complaint currently on file within 45 days of the Court’s ruling denying the motion to
16
remand.
17
5.
If any Plaintiff files an amended complaint rather than seeking remand,
18
Defendant shall have 30 days from the filing and service of such amended complaint in which to
19
plead, move or otherwise respond to it. The briefing schedule on any such motion shall be in
20
accordance with the Local Civil Rules for the Northern District of California.
21
22
Dated: December 13, 2011
BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP
23
By: /s/ David M. Balabanian
David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368)
Attorneys for Defendant The Bank of
New York Mellon Corporation
24
25
26
27
28
A/74624080.2
2
Case No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Dated: December 13, 2011
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
2
By: /s/ Lexi Hazam
Lexi Hazam (SBN 224457)
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Relator FX Analytics
3
4
5
Dated: December 13, 2011
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
6
By: /s/ Steven N. Williams
Steven N. Williams (SBN 175849)
Attorneys for Intervenors Los Angeles County
Employees Retirement Agency, San Diego
County Employee Retirement Association, Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power
Retirement Plan, and Stanislaus County
Employees Retirement Agency
7
8
9
10
Judge Jo
17
18
A
H
ER
pero
S
seph C.
LI
RT
16
D
RDERE
R NIA
S
15
UNIT
ED
14
OO
IT IS S
NO
13 Dated: Dec. 14, 2011
RT
U
O
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A/74624080.2
3
Case No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?