Bank of New York Mellon Corporation False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/14/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Email: david.balabanian@bingham.com Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. David L. Schwarz (SBN 206257) Sumner Square 1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 Email: dschwarz@khhte.com Telephone: 202.326.7900 Facsimile: 202.326.7999 Attorneys for Defendant THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 In re BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION FALSE CLAIMS ACT FOREIGN EXCHANGE LITIGATION, Ex rel. FX ANALYTICS, No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 A/74624080.2 Case No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and 2 agree to extend the time within which Defendant may plead, move or otherwise respond to the 3 Second Amended Complaint as follows: 4 1. On or before December 27, 2011, the Plaintiff/Relator and the Intervenors 5 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) may: (1) move to remand this action to state court in whole or in part, 6 (2) file a further amended complaint(s), or (3) take none of these actions. 7 2. If Plaintiffs neither move to remand nor file a further amended complaint, 8 Defendant shall have until January 23, 2012 to plead, move or otherwise respond to the Second 9 Amended Complaint currently on file in this action. 10 11 3. If Plaintiffs move to remand, Defendant shall have until January 23, 2012 to oppose such motion. 12 4. If a motion to remand is made and denied, Plaintiffs may amend the 13 present complaint within 15 days of the Court’s ruling denying the motion to remand. If no 14 Plaintiff elects to amend, Defendant shall plead, move, or otherwise respond to the Second 15 Amended Complaint currently on file within 45 days of the Court’s ruling denying the motion to 16 remand. 17 5. If any Plaintiff files an amended complaint rather than seeking remand, 18 Defendant shall have 30 days from the filing and service of such amended complaint in which to 19 plead, move or otherwise respond to it. The briefing schedule on any such motion shall be in 20 accordance with the Local Civil Rules for the Northern District of California. 21 22 Dated: December 13, 2011 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 23 By: /s/ David M. Balabanian David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368) Attorneys for Defendant The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 24 25 26 27 28 A/74624080.2 2 Case No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Dated: December 13, 2011 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 2 By: /s/ Lexi Hazam Lexi Hazam (SBN 224457) Attorneys for Plaintiff/Relator FX Analytics 3 4 5 Dated: December 13, 2011 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 6 By: /s/ Steven N. Williams Steven N. Williams (SBN 175849) Attorneys for Intervenors Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Agency, San Diego County Employee Retirement Association, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan, and Stanislaus County Employees Retirement Agency 7 8 9 10 Judge Jo 17 18 A H ER pero S seph C. LI RT 16 D RDERE R NIA S 15 UNIT ED 14 OO IT IS S NO 13 Dated: Dec. 14, 2011 RT U O 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A/74624080.2 3 Case No. 3:11-cv-05683-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?