Bank of New York Mellon Corporation False Claims Act Foreign Exchange Litigation v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Filing
59
NOTICE REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSIONS RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [re 45 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint CORRECTION OF DOCKET # 31 filed by The Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/6/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
In re BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORPORATION FALSE CLAIMS ACT FOREIGN
EXCHANGE LITIGATION,
Ex rel. FX ANALYTICS, LOS ANGELES COUNTRY
EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, LOS
ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER
RETIREMENT PLAN, SAN DIEGO COUNTY
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, AND
STANISLAUS COUNTY EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT
ASSOCIATION,
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff/Relator/Intervenors,
v.
No. C 11-05683 WHA
NOTICE REQUESTING
SUPPLEMENTAL
SUBMISSIONS
RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORPORATION, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
TRUST COMPANY, N.A., and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
/
22
23
On February 13, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to FRCP
24
12(b)(6) and (3). A hearing was held on defendants’ motion to dismiss on March 1. Two issues
25
raised in the briefs were not adequately addressed therein or at the hearing. Accordingly,
26
counsel shall provide supplemental briefs of no more than five pages by NOON ON MARCH 12,
27
2012, limited to the following issues:
28
1
1.
Defendants’ motion alleges valid and enforceable forum selection
2
clauses contained in defendants’ custody agreements with the LACERA,
3
Stanislaus County, and San Diego County funds.
4
5
(a)
Do plaintiffs dispute the existence of valid,
enforceable forum selection clauses in the governing agreements?
6
(b)
Counsel shall provide authority for why the clauses
7
should or should not be enforced where an action is brought on
8
behalf of the parties pursuant to the CFCA.
9
(c)
Do the parties dispute enforceability of the forum
10
selection clauses over non-CFCA state law claims? If so, counsel
11
shall submit relevant authority to support their respective
12
positions.
13
2.
14
15
Defendants’ motion further alleges the existence of a mandatory
dispute resolution clause in their custody agreement with LACERA.
(a)
Do plaintiffs dispute the existence of a valid,
16
enforceable, mandatory dispute resolution clause in the governing
17
agreement between LACERA and defendants?
18
(b)
Each party shall submit signed affidavits and
19
supporting documents showing what dispute resolution processes,
20
if any, have been employed, and if any of these processes are
21
pending.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: March 6, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?