Orozco v. Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company et al

Filing 25

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/27/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
William J. Dritsas (State Bar No. 97523)
Eden Anderson (State Bar No. 233464)
560 Mission, Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY

6
7
8
9

LAW OFFICES OF RANDAL M. BARNUM
Randal M. Barnum (State Bar No. 111287)
Carrie E. Croxall (State Bar No. 190430)
279 East H Street
Benicia, CA 94510
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
BULMARO OROZCO

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

BULMARO OROZCO,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING
)
COMPANY, EAGLE REFINERY, and DOES 1 )
-50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C 11 05756 CRB
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON
Complaint Filed: October 11, 2011

22
23

Plaintiff Bulmaro Orozco, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Tesoro Refining and Marketing

24

Company, which operates the Golden Eagle Refinery (“Defendant”), collectively “the Parties,”

25

by and through their counsel, file this Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal

26

Rule of Civil Procedure section 41.

27

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 11, 2011.

28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
Case No. C 11-05756-CRB

1

The Parties have entered into a “Release and Settlement Agreement” that settles all

2

aspects of the lawsuit as well as all aspects of Mr. Orozco’s workers’ compensation claim and

3

Labor Code section 132(a) claim that were pending in WCAB Case No. ADJ7897317.

4
5
6
7

Plaintiff moves to dismiss with prejudice the lawsuit against Defendant. Defendant
agrees to the dismissal with prejudice.
This Stipulation and Order may be signed in counterparts, and electronic and facsimile
signatures shall be as valid and as binding as original signatures.

8

WHEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their attorneys of record, so stipulate.

9

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

10
11
12

DATED: February 27, 2013

13

By

/s/ Eden Anderson
William J. Dritsas
Eden Anderson
Attorneys for Defendant
TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING
COMPANY

14
15
16
17

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

DATED: January 14, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF RANDAL M. BARNUM

18
19
20
21

By

/s/ Randal M. Barnum
Randal M. Barnum
Carrie E. Croxall
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BULMARO OROZCO, JR.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
Case No. C 11-05756-CRB

1

ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED:

3

Plaintiff’s lawsuit, Case No C 11-05756, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

S

Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge
D

DERE

O OR
IT IS S

8
J

11

A

H

ER

LI

RT

10

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

9

R NIA

7

UNIT
ED

6

Dated: February 27, 2013

RT
U
O

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
________________________________
TA

FO

4

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
Case No. C 11-05756-CRB