Castagnola v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filing 9

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/22/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Karl S. Kronenberger (State Bar No. 226112)
Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (State Bar No. 222187)
Virginia A. Sanderson (State Bar No. 240241)
KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Thomas M. Peterson (State Bar No. 96011)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company dba Snapfish.com

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CAROL HILL CASTAGNOLA, an
)
individual, individually and on behalf of a )
class of similarly situated persons,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY dba )
SNAPFISH.COM, a California corporation, )
and REGENT GROUP, INC. dba ENCORE )
MARKETING INTERNATIONAL, INC., )
a Delaware Corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. CV 11-5772 JCS
CLASS ACTION
JOINT STIPULATION
EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero

25
26
27
28

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT – CASE NO. CV 11-5772 JCS
DB1/ 68726534.1

1

Plaintiff Carol Hill Castagnola (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Hewlett-Packard

2

Company dba Snapfish.com (“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of

3

record, in accordance with Civil L.R. 6-1(a), STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on December 5,

4
5
6
7
8
9

2011;
WHEREAS, Defendant requests additional time to respond to the
Complaint;
WHEREAS, the time extension will not alter the date of any event or any
deadline already fixed by Court Order;

10

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY

11

AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT the time for Defendant Hewlett-Packard

12

Company dba Snapfish.com to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended

13

to January 26, 2012 to allow Defendant sufficient time to prepare a response.

14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15

18
19

KRONENBERGER
LLP

By:
/s/ Thomas S. Peterson
THOMAS M. PETERSON
Attorneys for Defendant HewlettPackard Company dba Snapfish.com

By:
s/ Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld
JEFFREY M. ROSENFELD
Attorneys for Plaintiff Carol Hill
Castagnola

22

UNIT
ED

Dated: 12/22/11

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

OO
IT IS S

23
se
Judge Jo

26

A

H

ER

LI

RT

25

D

RDERE

pero
ph C. S

NO

24

RT
U
O

21

S

20

ROSENFELD,

R NIA

17

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

FO

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28

2
DB1/ 68726534.1

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT – CASE NO. CV 11-5772 JCS

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, THOMAS M. PETERSON, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used

3

to file this JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE

4

COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the signatories

5

above have concurred in this efiling.

6

Executed on this 21st day of December 2011, at San Francisco, California.

7

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP

8

/s/ Thomas M. Peterson

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
DB1/ 68726534.1

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT – CASE NO. CV 11-5772 JCS