Smith-Lee v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS. The Court ordered plaintiff to show cause no later than May 11, 2012 why her claims against defendants should not be dismissed for failure to serve defendants. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 11-5775 MMC 11 REBECCA SMITH-LEE, 13 14 v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS Plaintiff, 12 / By order filed April 26, 2012, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause, in writing and no later than May 11, 2012, why her claims against defendants should not be dismissed for failure to serve defendants within the time required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 16, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?