Hicks v. Kate
Filing
3
ORDER OF TRANSFER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
MICHAEL HICKS,
11
12
No. C 11-5794 SI (pr)
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF TRANSFER
v.
13
MATTHEW KATE,
Secretary of California Department
14 Of Corrections and Rehabilitation,
15
16
Defendant.
/
17
18
Michael Hicks filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, complaining of events
19
and omissions that occurred at the California Men's Colony in San Luis Obispo, where he
20
previously was housed. That facility is in San Luis Obispo County, within the venue of the
21
Central District of California. The lone defendant apparently resides in the Eastern District of
22
California, but there are no allegations of any wrongdoing by that defendant. No defendant is
23
alleged to reside in, and none of the events or omissions giving rise to the complaint occurred
24
in, the Northern District. Venue therefore would be proper in the Central District and not in this
25
one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The Central District (where the alleged wrongs occurred) is
26
preferable to the Eastern District (where the lone defendant apparently resides) for venue
27
because the defendant has not been linked to any claim and quite possibly will not remain as a
28
1
defendant. Accordingly, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this
2
action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of
3
California. The clerk shall transfer this matter.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2012
______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?