Bennett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al
Filing
109
ORDER VACATING DEFAULT re #108 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #79 Clerks Notice of Entry of Default filed by Bank Melli. #95 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Awarding Turnover Of Blocked Assets, Discharge Of Stakeholders And Entry Of Final Judgment On Consent Of Parties filed by CIPPORAH KAPLAN et al. and #98 MOTION to Stay Distribution filed by Bank Melli are withdrawn without prejudice; #104 MOTION to Set Aside Default filed by Bank Melli is granted. Bank Melli shall move or answer the Third-Party Compalint within 30 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/5/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
1 MOLO LAMKEN LLP
JEFFREY A. LAMKEN (CA Bar # 154217)
2 The Watergate, Suite 660
600 New Hampshire Ave.
3 Washington, D.C. 20037
Telephone: (202) 556-2000
4 Facsimile: (202) 556-2001
5
6 Counsel for Third-Party Defendant
BANK MELLI
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
MICHAEL BENNETT, et al.,
13
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER VACATING DEFAULT
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
Case No. CV 11-5807 (CRB) (NJV)
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,
et al.,
Before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer
and Nandor J. Vadas
Defendants.
17
18
19
VISA INC. and
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.,
20
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
23
BANK MELLI, et al.,
Third-Party Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Third-Party Defendant Bank Melli, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs
2
Visa Inc. and Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Visa” and “Franklin”), Plaintiffs Michael
3
Bennett et al. (the “Bennett Plaintiffs”), Third-Party Defendants Steven Green-
4
baum and Carlos Acosta et al. (the “Greenbaum/Acosta Judgment Creditors”), and
5
Third-Party Defendants Estate of Michael Heiser et al. (the “Heiser Judgment
6
Creditors”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby consent and stipu-
7
late to the entry of this Order, and the Court concludes that good cause has been
8
shown for the entry thereof:
9
10
11
1.
Bank Melli’s motion to set aside the default (Doc. No. 104) is hereby
GRANTED. The Clerk’s entry of default (Doc. No. 79) is hereby VACATED.
2.
The vacating of the Clerk’s entry of default does not constitute a con-
12
sent or agreement to any of the arguments or defenses raised by Bank
13
Melli opposing the right of the Bennett Plaintiffs, the Greenbaum/Acosta Judgment
14
Creditors, and the Heiser Judgment Creditors to a turnover of the assets deposited
15
into the Court’s registry by Visa and Franklin.
16
3.
Bank Melli hereby waives its objections to service of the summons
17
and third-party complaint (Doc. Nos. 16, 45), reserving all other jurisdictional,
18
immunity, and other defenses and objections.
19
4.
The Stipulation with Proposed Order Awarding Turnover of Blocked
20
Assets, Discharge of Stakeholders and Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. No. 95) and
21
Bank Melli’s Motion to Stay Distribution (Doc. No. 98) are hereby WITH-
22
DRAWN without prejudice.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
5.
Bank Melli shall move against or answer the Third-Party Complaint
within 30 days of the entry of this Order.
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
San Francisco, California
S
July 5, 2012
UNIT
ED
7
Dated:
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
D
RDERE
IS SO O
IT
9
NO
ER
12
A
H
11
LI
RT
10
yer
s R. Bre
harle
Judge C
R NIA
5
FO
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?