Sandoval et al v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 161

ORDER Granting 159 Stipulated Request to Reschedule Case Management Conference. The Case Management Conference previously scheduled for 07/21/14 is CONTINUED to 09/08/14 at 1:30 PM. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/17/14. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THOMAS F. BERTRAND, State Bar No. 056560 RICHARD W. OSMAN, State Bar No. 167993 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 353-0999 Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 Email: rosman@bfesf.com Attorneys for Defendant Sonoma County Sheriff Steve Freitas in his personal capacity 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 RAFAEL MATEOS-SANDOVAL and SIMEON AVENDANO RUIZ, individually and as class representatives, 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, Case No. CV-11-05817 TEH (NC) JOINT STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, STEVE FREITAS, CITY OF SANTA ROSA, SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM SCHWEDHELM, and DOES 1 through 20, individually and in their official capacities, CMC Date: July 21, 2014 CMC Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 19 19 Defendants. 20 ______________________________________/ 21 22 TO THE HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: 23 This Joint Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference is submitted by the 24 following parties in this action: Plaintiffs Rafael Mateos-Sandoval and Simeon Avendano Ruiz 25 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”); Defendant Sonoma County Sheriff Steve Freitas sued in his personal 26 capacity only (“Sheriff Freitas”); and Defendants the City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa Police 27 Department, and Santa Rosa Police Chief Tom Schwedhelm (collectively, “City Defendants”). 28 Defendants the County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office, and Sonoma County Sheriff Joint Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference; [Proposed] Order Mateos-Sandoval, et al. v. County of Sonoma, et al., U.S.D.C. No. cv-11-05817 TEH (NC) 1 1 Steve Freitas sued in his official capacity are not parties to this stipulation, as this action is currently 2 stayed as to all claims against them based on their pending appeal. (See e.g., Order entered April 10, 3 2013, Dkt. No. 92.) 4 The parties to this stipulation request the Court to enter an order continuing the Case 5 Management Conference currently scheduled to occur in this matter on July 21, 2014, to September 6 8, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. The parties submit that good cause supports their request, as set forth below. 7 8 9 10 RECITALS A. All discovery issues in this case have been assigned to the Honorable Nathanael Cousins pursuant to an Order of Reference issued by this Court on May 6, 2014. (Dkt. No. 33.) B. At a discovery hearing held on June 25, 2014, Magistrate Cousins addressed 11 Plaintiffs’ requests for additional discovery from Defendants. In light of impending deposition dates 12 and additional documents the Magistrate intended to order produced, the parties and Magistrate 13 Cousins determined that a deposition of the City Defendants should be rescheduled to July 21, 2014. 14 The parties and Magistrate Cousins discussed the fact that a Case Management Conference was 15 currently scheduled to be held in this Court on that same day, July 21, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Magistrate 16 Cousins expressed his belief that this Court would be willing to reschedule the Case Management 17 Conference to accommodate the parties’ discovery process, particularly in light of the fact that the 18 Court had referred the discovery issues to Magistrate Cousins for resolution. 19 C. Magistrate Cousins entered orders with respect to several discovery issues discussed 20 at the June 25th hearing, and set a follow-up hearing on those issues for August 13, 2014. (See Dkt. 21 Nos. 152, 158) 22 D. The parties request this Court to continue the Case Management Conference, 23 currently set for July 21, 2014, to a date after the follow-up discovery hearing currently set before 24 Magistrate Cousins, and preferably September 8, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. 25 Management Conference will allow Plaintiffs to be able to depose the City Defendants’ “Persons 26 Most Knowledgeable” on a date after relevant documents have been produced (which Plaintiffs 27 anticipate using during the deposition). In addition, the parties believe that rescheduling the Case Rescheduling the Case 28 Joint Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference; [Proposed] Order Mateos-Sandoval, et al. v. County of Sonoma, et al., U.S.D.C. No. cv-11-05817 TEH (NC) 2 1 Management Conference will allow them to present scheduling and related issues more fully to the 2 Court, and would conserve the resources of the parties and the Court. 3 4 WHEREFORE, the parties to this stipulation hereby agree and request entry of an order as follows: 5 6 7 8 STIPULATION 1. The parties request the Court to enter an order rescheduling the Case Management Conference, currently set for July 21, 2014, to September 8, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. 2. Nothing in this Stipulation and request for order is intended to modify the other 9 matters addressed in any Court order unless expressly identified herein, nor does it preclude the 10 parties from seeking additional relief from this Court, to amend this stipulation and order or 11 otherwise. Respectfully Submitted, 12 13 Dated: July 16, 2014 14 Bertrand, Fox & Elliot By: 15 16 Dated: July 16, 2014 17 Caroline L. Fowler, Santa Rosa City Attorney By: 18 19 20 21 Dated: July 16, 2014 /s/ Richard W. Osman Richard W. Osman Attorneys for Defendant Sheriff Steve Freitas /s/ Robert L. Jackson Robert L. Jackson, Assistant City Attorney Attorneys for City Defendants Robert Mann & Donald W. Cook, Attorneys at Law By: /s/ Donald W. Cook Donald W. Cook Attorneys for Plaintiffs 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference; [Proposed] Order Mateos-Sandoval, et al. v. County of Sonoma, et al., U.S.D.C. No. cv-11-05817 TEH (NC) 3 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to and in accordance with the foregoing Stipulation, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 4 The Case Management Conference, currently set to be held in this case on July 21, 2014, 5 shall be rescheduled to September 8, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall submit a joint case 6 management statement at least one week prior to the Case Management Conference. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Date: _____________ 07/17/14 9 ___________________________ _ HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation to Reschedule Case Management Conference; [Proposed] Order Mateos-Sandoval, et al. v. County of Sonoma, et al., U.S.D.C. No. cv-11-05817 TEH (NC) 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?