Padilla et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING CMC AND RELATED DEADLINES re (19 in 3:11-cv-05975-EMC) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation for Continuance and (Proposed) Order filed by Carrier IQ, Inc, Motions terminated: (19 in 3:11-cv-05975-EMC) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation for Continuance and (Proposed) Order filed by Carrier IQ, Inc, (12 in 3:11-cv-05975-EMC) MOTION to Relate Case.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865) rcole@fenwick.com MOLLY R. MELCHER (CSB No. 272950) mmelcher@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: 650.988.8500 Facsimile: 650.938.5200 6 7 8 9 10 TYLER G. NEWBY (CSB No. 205790) tnewby@fenwick.com JENNIFER J. JOHNSON (CSB No. 252897) jjjohnson@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.875.2300 Facsimile: 415.281.1350 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Attorneys for Defendant CARRIER IQ, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 LINDSAY PADILLA, ELIEZER PILOWSKY, and STEVEN WATTS, on behalf of themselves and ALL others similarly situated, 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 3:11-cv-05975-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE Plaintiffs, v. CARRIER IQ, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Does 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. 22 23 24 Pursuant to stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 25 1. 26 27 28 The Initial Case Management Conference and all associated deadlines, and the date set for ADR certification and selection are continued until further order from this Court. 2. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Carrier IQ of any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: 3:11-cv-05975-EMC jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process, or service of process. 2 UNIT ED S 4/24/12 RT U O Dated: 5 ard M. NO 6 RT 7 dw Judge E ER 9 Chen A H 8 R NIA Honorable Edward DERED R M. Chen United IS SODistrict Judge States O IT 4 FO 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Case No.: 3:11-cv-05975-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?