United States of America v. Approximately $40,000 in United States Currency Seized from the Luggage of Phillip Alarcon
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the Government's Motion to Strike 18 should not be granted. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/19/2013 at 10:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 7/12/2013 at 10:00 AM is VACATED. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on July 11, 2013. (crblc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. CV 11-6123 CRB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
APPROXIMATELY $40,000 IN UNITED
STATES CURRENCY,
Defendant.
/
17
PHILLIP ALARCON,
Claimant.
18
19
/
20
In this action, the Government seeks the forfeiture of approximately $40,000 in
21
United States Currency that was seized from Phillip Alarcon in 2011. See generally Compl.
22
(dkt. 1). Pending before the Court is the Government’s motion to strike Phillip Alarcon’s
23
claim to the currency, which he filed pro se, for lack of standing under 18 U.S.C. 983(a)(4)
24
and Supplemental Rules G(5) and G(8)(c)(i)(B). See generally Mot. (dkt. 18). Alarcon has
25
not opposed the motion, and the Government has informed the Court that the Motion to
26
Strike and Reply that mailed to Alarcon at his last address were returned to sender and
27
unable to be forwarded. See Notice (dkt. 20).
28
1
The Court ORDERS Alarcon to show cause at a hearing on July 19, 2013, at 10:00
2
am., why the Government’s motion to strike his claim should not be granted. The hearing on
3
the Government’s motion scheduled for July 12, 2013, is hereby VACATED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: July 11, 2013
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?