Patterson v. Franklin
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; AND DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/15/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
ANDRE PATTERSON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
13
No. C 11-06137 JSW
v.
RACHIALLE FRANKLIN,
Defendant.
/
ORDER DENYING
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND
DISMISSING CASE
14
15
The Court has received Plaintiff’s complaint and application to proceed in forma
16
pauperis, both filed in this Court on December 5, 2011. The Court may authorize a plaintiff to
17
file an action in federal court without prepayment of fees or security if the plaintiff submits an
18
affidavit showing that he or she is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. §
19
1915(a). The in forma pauperis statute also provides that the Court shall dismiss the case if at
20
any time the Court determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the action (1) is
21
frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks
22
monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
23
Plaintiff has failed to set forth “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
24
pleader is entitled to relief” as required by Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
25
Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because he fails to
26
allege that Defendant was acting on behalf of the federal or state government. See Public
27
Utilities Comm’n of Dist. of Columbia v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451, 461 (1952) (holding that the
28
First and Fifth Amendments “apply to and restrict only the Federal Government and not private
1
persons.”); see also West v. Adkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48-49 (1988) (holding that a claim for relief
2
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 requires a showing of constitutional violations committed by persons
3
acting under color of state law).
4
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY DISMISSES the complaint with leave to amend and
5
DENIES the application to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this action,
6
he must file an amended complaint and a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis by
7
January 3, 2012. Failure to file a cognizable legal claim by this date shall result in dismissal of
8
this action with prejudice. The Court advises Plaintiff that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants,
9
which contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through
the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiff that additional
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
assistance may be available by making an appointment with the Legal Help Center, which is
12
located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Room 2796, San Francisco, California, 94102.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: December 15, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ANDRE PATTERSON,
Case Number: CV11-06137 JSW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
v.
8
RACHIALLE FRANKLIN et al,
9
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
12 District Court, Northern District of California.
13 That on December 15, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
14 listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
15
16
17 Andre Patterson
1419 Striped Bass, #F
18 San Francisco, CA 94130
19 Dated: December 15, 2011
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?