Young v. Sara Lee Corporation et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/13/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Case3:11-cv-06146-CRB Document8 Filed01/11/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

DANIELLE OCHS-TILLOTSON, State Bar No. 178677
[e-mail]
GREGORY C. CHENG, State Bar No. 226865
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, INC.
(erroneously sued as “Sara Lee Corporation”)

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

JOHN YOUNG,
Plaintiff,

13
vs.

14
15
16

Case No. C 11-06146 CRB

SARA LEE CORPORATION, an Illinois
corporation; CARI OLINGER, an individual;
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT
TO FRCP 41(a)
Action Filed: October 14, 2011
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

17
18
19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
11583077_1.DOC

Case No. C 11-06146 CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF THE
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)

Case3:11-cv-06146-CRB Document8 Filed01/11/12 Page2 of 2

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties to this action through their

2

designated counsel that the above-referenced action be and hereby is dismissed, with prejudice,

3

pursuant to FRCP Section 41(a)(1).

4
5

DATED: January 11, 2012

6

LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M.
LOVRETOVICH

7
8

By:
/s/ Christopher W. Taylor
JOSEPH M. LOVRETOVICH
CHRISTOPHER W. TAYLOR
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN YOUNG

9
10
11
12

DATED: January 11, 2012

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

13
14
By:
/s/ Gregory C. Cheng
DANIELLE OCHS-TILLOTSON
GREGORY C. CHENG
Attorneys for Defendant EARTHGRAINS
BAKING COMPANIES, INC.

15
16
17
18

PROPOSED ORDER

19

action. It is further ordered that each parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

reyer
rles R. B

NO

26

RT

ER

H

27

ha
Judge C

28
11583077_1.DOC

R NIA

25

________________________________
The Honorable Charles R.RDERED
Breyer
O
T IS SO
USDC Northern IDistrict of California
UNIT
ED

January 13, 2012
Dated: _____________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

S

23

FO

22

ordered that the instant action is dismissed with prejudice as to all parties and as to all causes of

LI

21

IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby

A

20

C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
1
Case No. C 11-06146 CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF THE
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)
N