Stoltenbury et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING CMC AND DEADLINES, Motions terminated: (19 in 3:11-cv-06160-EMC) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation for Continuance and (Proposed) Order filed by Carrier IQ, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865)
[e-mail]
MOLLY R. MELCHER (CSB No. 272950)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.938.5200

6
7
8
9
10

TYLER G. NEWBY (CSB No. 205790)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER J. JOHNSON (CSB No. 252897)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.281.1350

11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

Attorneys for Defendant
CARRIER IQ, INC.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18

SAM STOLTENBURG and AMBER
WESTENBERGER, on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

Plaintiff,

19
20

Case No.: 3:11-cv-06160-EMC

v.

23

CARRIER IQ, INC.; LG ELECTRONICS
U.S.A., INC., LG ELECTRONICS
MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., and LG
ELECTRONICS MOBILE RESEARCH U.S.A.,
LLC,

24

Defendants.

21
22

25
26

Pursuant to stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

27

1.

28

from this Court.

The date set for ADR certification and selection is continued until further order

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:11-cv-06160-EMC

2.

1

This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Carrier IQ or the LGE Defendants

2

of any defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of

3

subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process, or service of process.

6
7

dward
Judge E

NO

8

RT

9

ER

11

n

M. Che

A

H

10

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

LI

UNIT
ED

Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

R NIA

S

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

5

4/24/12

FO

4

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Case No. 3:11-cv-06160-EMC