eSilicon Corporation v. Silicon Space Technology Corporation
Filing
123
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on December 20, 2012. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ESILICON CORP,
Plaintiff,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
No. C -11-06184 EDL
ORDER
v.
11
SILICON SPACE TECH,
12
Defendant.
/
13
14
On December 4, 2012, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the theory of
15
implied license, which is set for hearing on January 9, 2013. On December 19, 2012, Plaintiff filed
16
an opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment, and also filed a separate cross-motion
17
for summary judgment on the implied license theory. In an effort to avoid duplicative and
18
cumulative briefing on the cross-motions, the Court modifies the remaining briefing schedule for the
19
cross-motions as follows. Pursuant to the Court's December 19, 2012 Order following the parties’
20
stipulation, Defendant's reply shall be filed no later than December 27, 2012. If Plaintiff wishes to
21
file a sur-reply following the filing of Defendant's reply, it may do so no later than January 3, 2013.
22
There shall be no further briefing on the implied license theory in connection with the cross-motions
23
for summary judgment. The hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment is continued to
24
January 15, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: December 20, 2012
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?