eSilicon Corporation v. Silicon Space Technology Corporation

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 33 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by eSilicon Corporation filed by eSilicon Corporation, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on March 28, 2012. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)

Case3:11-cv-06184-EDL Document33 Filed03/27/12 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6

RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865)
[e-mail]
RYAN TYZ (CSB No. 234895)
[e-mail]
MEREDITH L. ERDMAN (CSB No. 273126)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650.938.5200

7
8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
eSILICON CORPORATION
DENISE M. DE MORY (SBN 168076)
[e-mail]
LINDSAY WHITE (SBN 261610)
[e-mail]
DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP
1950 University Avenue, Suite 500
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650.845.7333
Attorneys for Defendant
SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20

eSILICON CORPORATION, a Delaware
Corporation,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,

Case No. C-11-06184
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

CASE NO. C-11-06184-EDL

Case3:11-cv-06184-EDL Document33 Filed03/27/12 Page2 of 4

1
2
3
4

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Private Mediation with
Dean M. Kilgore.

5

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by May 4, 2012.

6

The parties further agree to hold another private mediation at a later date and with a

7

provider to be agreed upon by the parties if the earlier mediation is unsuccessful.

8
9

Dated: March 27, 2012

FENWICK & WEST LLP

10
11

By:

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14

Dated: March 27, 2012

/s/ Rodger R. Cole
Rodger R. Cole
Attorneys for Plaintiff
eSILICON CORPORATION

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP

15
16

By:

17
18

/s/ Denise M. De Mory
Denise M. De Mory
Attorneys for Defendant
SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

2

CASE NO. C-11-06184-EDL

Case3:11-cv-06184-EDL Document33 Filed03/27/12 Page3 of 4

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45

1
2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I, Rodger R.

3

Cole, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the

4

other signatories to this document.

5

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

6

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 27th day of March, 2012, at Mountain View,

7

California.

8
9

By:

10

/s/ Rodger R. Cole
Rodger R. Cole

11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

3

CASE NO. C-11-06184-EDL

Case3:11-cv-06184-EDL Document33 Filed03/27/12 Page4 of 4

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

March 28, 2012
Dated: ____________________

_______________________________
Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte

6
7
8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

4

CASE NO. C-11-06184-EDL