eSilicon Corporation v. Silicon Space Technology Corporation
Filing
98
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 96 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE NOVEMBER 27, 2012 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Silicon Space Technology Corporation: Case Management Statement due by 2/5/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/12/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/5/2012. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865)
rcole@fenwick.com
RYAN TYZ (CSB No. 234895)
rtyz@fenwick.com
MEREDITH L. ERDMAN (CSB No. 273126)
merdman@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone: 650.988.8500
Facsimile:
650.938.5200
7
8
9
10
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
eSILICON CORPORATION
DENISE M. DE MORY (SBN 168076)
ddemory@bdiplaw.com
CHRISTINA M. FINN (SBN 247838)
cfinn@bdiplaw.com
BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH, & ALLISON LLP
55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: (415) 675-8889
Facsimile: (415) 675-8892
Attorneys for Defendant
SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21
eSILICON CORPORATION, a Delaware
Corporation,
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff,
v.
SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE NOVEMBER
27, 2012 FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AS MODIFIED
Date:
November 27, 2012
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Dept:
Courtroom E – 15th Floor
Judge:
Magistrate Judge Laporte
Trial Date: October 7, 2012
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF.
Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL
This Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is entered into by and between counsel for Plaintiff
1
2
eSilicon Corporation (“eSilicon”) and counsel for Defendant Silicon Space Technology
3
Corporation (“SST”) (collectively, the “Parties”) as follows:
WHEREAS, a related action is currently pending before the District Court of Travis
4
5
County, Texas, 126th Judicial District, Silicon Space Technology Corp. v. eSilicon Corp., Case
6
No. D-1-GN-11-001750 (the “Texas Action”);
WHEREAS, trial in the Texas Action was formerly scheduled to begin on October 15,
7
8
2012;
9
WHEREAS, pursuant to the August 8, 2012 Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury
10
Trial (Dkt. No. 79), a further case management conference was scheduled for November 13, 2012
11
at 10:00 a.m.;
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
WHEREAS, the August 8, 2012 Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (Dkt.
13
No. 79) states that the parties shall file an updated joint case management conference statement
14
no later than November 6, 2012;
15
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s October 3, 2012 Order Granting in Part With Leave
16
to Amend Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 92), the parties are to file a
17
joint report within a week of the conclusion of the trial in the Texas Action informing the Court
18
of the outcome of that case and its impact on this case;
19
20
21
22
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2012, the Texas court continued the October 15, 2012 trial
of the Texas Action to January 14, 2013 due to outstanding discovery issues;
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, eSilicon requested an additional extension of the
January 14, 2013 trial date due to outstanding discovery;
23
WHEREAS, the Texas court denied eSilicon’s request for an extension of the trial date as
24
premature but noted that eSilicon may renew its request at a later date depending on the status of
25
SST’s document production;
26
27
28
WHEREAS, eSilicon may wish to renew its request for an extension of the January 14,
2013 trial in the Texas Action at a later time;
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2012, the Court reset the further case management
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF.
2
Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL
1
conference that was scheduled for November 13, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. to November 27, 2012, at
2
9:00 a.m., to be heard with the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No 95);
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that the November 27, 2012 further case
management conference should be continued to a later date;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel of record,
hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, as follows:
1.
The further case management conference currently scheduled for November 27,
2012 at 10:00 a.m. is continued until after the trial in the Texas Action;
2.
Should trial of the Texas Action take place on January 14, 2013, the Parties will
MOUNTAIN VIEW
that case and its impact on this case, and proposing a time for a further case management
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
file a joint report within a week of the conclusion of trial informing the Court of the outcome of
11
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
10
conference;
13
3.
Alternatively, should trial of the Texas Action be rescheduled to a later date, the
14
Parties will file a joint report informing this Court of the new trial date and its impact on the
15
scheduling of this case, and proposing a time for a further case management conference.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF.
3
Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL
1
Dated: November 2, 2012
FENWICK & WEST LLP
2
By: /s/ Rodger R. Cole
Rodger R. Cole
3
4
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Tel:
(650) 988-8500
Fax:
(650) 938-5200
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
eSILICON CORPORATION
8
9
10
Dated: November 2, 2012
BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH & ALLISON
LLP
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
By: /s/ Denise M. De Mory
Denise M. De Mory
13
BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH & ALLISON
LLP
55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: (415) 675-8889
Facsimile: (415) 675-8892
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant
SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
18
19
20
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
21
I, Denise M. De Mory, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
22
used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
23
NOVEMBER 27, 2012 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance
24
with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Denise De Mory has concurred in this filing.
25
26
Dated:
November 2, 2012
/s/ Denise M. De Mory
Denise M. De Mory
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF.
4
Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL
[PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED
1
2
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that:
3
1.
4
5
The Case Management Conference presently scheduled for November 27, 2012 is
continued. to February 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.
4.
Should trial of the related matter in the District Court of Travis County, Texas,
6
126th Judicial District, Silicon Space Technology Corp. v. eSilicon Corp., Case No. D-1-GN-11-
7
001750 (the “Texas Action”) take place on January 14, 2013, the parties shall file a joint report
8
within a week of the conclusion of the trial informing the Court of the outcome of that case and
9
its impact on this case, and proposing a time for a further case management conference.
10
2.
Alternatively, should the trial of the Texas Action be rescheduled to a later date,
S
13
14
abeth D
dge Eliz
Ju
ER
20
A
H
19
FO
RT
18
e
. Laport
NO
17
LI
November 5, 2012
Dated: __________________________
R NIA
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
____________________________________
DIFIE
AS MO
Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte
15
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
MOUNTAIN VIEW
scheduling of this case, and proposing a time for a further case management conference.
RT
U
O
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
the parties shall file a joint report informing this Court of the new trial date and its impact on the
12
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF.
5
Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?