eSilicon Corporation v. Silicon Space Technology Corporation

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 96 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE NOVEMBER 27, 2012 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Silicon Space Technology Corporation: Case Management Statement due by 2/5/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/12/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/5/2012. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 RODGER R. COLE (CSB No. 178865) rcole@fenwick.com RYAN TYZ (CSB No. 234895) rtyz@fenwick.com MEREDITH L. ERDMAN (CSB No. 273126) merdman@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: 650.988.8500 Facsimile: 650.938.5200 7 8 9 10 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff eSILICON CORPORATION DENISE M. DE MORY (SBN 168076) ddemory@bdiplaw.com CHRISTINA M. FINN (SBN 247838) cfinn@bdiplaw.com BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH, & ALLISON LLP 55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 675-8889 Facsimile: (415) 675-8892 Attorneys for Defendant SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 eSILICON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, v. SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE NOVEMBER 27, 2012 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED Date: November 27, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: Courtroom E – 15th Floor Judge: Magistrate Judge Laporte Trial Date: October 7, 2012 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF. Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL This Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is entered into by and between counsel for Plaintiff 1 2 eSilicon Corporation (“eSilicon”) and counsel for Defendant Silicon Space Technology 3 Corporation (“SST”) (collectively, the “Parties”) as follows: WHEREAS, a related action is currently pending before the District Court of Travis 4 5 County, Texas, 126th Judicial District, Silicon Space Technology Corp. v. eSilicon Corp., Case 6 No. D-1-GN-11-001750 (the “Texas Action”); WHEREAS, trial in the Texas Action was formerly scheduled to begin on October 15, 7 8 2012; 9 WHEREAS, pursuant to the August 8, 2012 Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury 10 Trial (Dkt. No. 79), a further case management conference was scheduled for November 13, 2012 11 at 10:00 a.m.; MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 WHEREAS, the August 8, 2012 Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (Dkt. 13 No. 79) states that the parties shall file an updated joint case management conference statement 14 no later than November 6, 2012; 15 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s October 3, 2012 Order Granting in Part With Leave 16 to Amend Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 92), the parties are to file a 17 joint report within a week of the conclusion of the trial in the Texas Action informing the Court 18 of the outcome of that case and its impact on this case; 19 20 21 22 WHEREAS, on September 27, 2012, the Texas court continued the October 15, 2012 trial of the Texas Action to January 14, 2013 due to outstanding discovery issues; WHEREAS, on October 11, 2012, eSilicon requested an additional extension of the January 14, 2013 trial date due to outstanding discovery; 23 WHEREAS, the Texas court denied eSilicon’s request for an extension of the trial date as 24 premature but noted that eSilicon may renew its request at a later date depending on the status of 25 SST’s document production; 26 27 28 WHEREAS, eSilicon may wish to renew its request for an extension of the January 14, 2013 trial in the Texas Action at a later time; WHEREAS, on November 2, 2012, the Court reset the further case management STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF. 2 Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL 1 conference that was scheduled for November 13, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. to November 27, 2012, at 2 9:00 a.m., to be heard with the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No 95); 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that the November 27, 2012 further case management conference should be continued to a later date; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, as follows: 1. The further case management conference currently scheduled for November 27, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. is continued until after the trial in the Texas Action; 2. Should trial of the Texas Action take place on January 14, 2013, the Parties will MOUNTAIN VIEW that case and its impact on this case, and proposing a time for a further case management 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW file a joint report within a week of the conclusion of trial informing the Court of the outcome of 11 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 conference; 13 3. Alternatively, should trial of the Texas Action be rescheduled to a later date, the 14 Parties will file a joint report informing this Court of the new trial date and its impact on the 15 scheduling of this case, and proposing a time for a further case management conference. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF. 3 Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL 1 Dated: November 2, 2012 FENWICK & WEST LLP 2 By: /s/ Rodger R. Cole Rodger R. Cole 3 4 FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Tel: (650) 988-8500 Fax: (650) 938-5200 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff eSILICON CORPORATION 8 9 10 Dated: November 2, 2012 BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH & ALLISON LLP 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 By: /s/ Denise M. De Mory Denise M. De Mory 13 BUNSOW, DE MORY, SMITH & ALLISON LLP 55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 675-8889 Facsimile: (415) 675-8892 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant SILICON SPACE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 18 19 20 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 21 I, Denise M. De Mory, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 22 used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 23 NOVEMBER 27, 2012 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance 24 with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Denise De Mory has concurred in this filing. 25 26 Dated: November 2, 2012 /s/ Denise M. De Mory Denise M. De Mory 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF. 4 Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED 1 2 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that: 3 1. 4 5 The Case Management Conference presently scheduled for November 27, 2012 is continued. to February 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. 4. Should trial of the related matter in the District Court of Travis County, Texas, 6 126th Judicial District, Silicon Space Technology Corp. v. eSilicon Corp., Case No. D-1-GN-11- 7 001750 (the “Texas Action”) take place on January 14, 2013, the parties shall file a joint report 8 within a week of the conclusion of the trial informing the Court of the outcome of that case and 9 its impact on this case, and proposing a time for a further case management conference. 10 2. Alternatively, should the trial of the Texas Action be rescheduled to a later date, S 13 14 abeth D dge Eliz Ju ER 20 A H 19 FO RT 18 e . Laport NO 17 LI November 5, 2012 Dated: __________________________ R NIA ERED O ORD D IT IS S ____________________________________ DIFIE AS MO Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte 15 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED MOUNTAIN VIEW scheduling of this case, and proposing a time for a further case management conference. RT U O ATTORNEYS AT LAW the parties shall file a joint report informing this Court of the new trial date and its impact on the 12 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MGMT. CONF. 5 Case No. 3:11-CV-6184-EDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?