San Mateo Electrical Workers Health Care Trust et al v. Engelhart Electric Company, Inc.
Filing
41
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint, to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice filed by Dominic Nolan, San Mateo Electrical Workers Health Care Trust, San Mateo County Electrical Apprenticeship Training Trust, Local 617 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, National Electrical Contractors Association, San Mateo Chapter, San Mateo County Electrical Construction Industry Retirement Trust, Motions terminated: 40 STIPULATI ON WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint, to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice filed by Dominic Nolan, San Mateo Electrical Workers Health Care Trust, San Mateo County Electrical Apprenticeship Training Trust, Local 617 International Br otherhood of Electrical Workers, National Electrical Contractors Association, San Mateo Chapter, San Mateo County Electrical Construction Industry Retirement Trust, 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue CMC filed by Dominic Nolan, San Mateo Electrical Workers Health Care Trust, San Mateo County Electrical Apprenticeship Training Trust, Local 617 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, National Electrical Contractors Association, San Mateo Chapter, San Mateo County Electrical Construction Industry Retirement Trust.All deadlines are terminated. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/25/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
EILEEN M. BISSEN, Bar No. 245821
CHLOE QUAIL, Bar No. 262797
NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL
369 Pine Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94104-6702
TEL: (415) 677-9440
FAX: (415) 677-9445
Email: ebissen@neyhartlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROGER MASON, Bar No. 107486
SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON & BOSOMWORTH
983 University Avenue, Suite 104C
Los Gatos, CA 95032-7637
TEL: (408) 356-3000
FAX: (408) 354-8839
Attorneys for Defendant
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(San Francisco Division)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SAN MATEO ELECTRICAL WORKERS
HEALTH CARE TRUST; INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL
WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 617; SAN
MATEO COUNTY ELECTRICAL
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
RETIREMENT TRUST; SAN MATEO
ELECTRICAL WORKERS EDUCATION
AND TRAINING PLAN; Dominic Nolan, as
Trustee of the above TRUSTS; and
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
ASSOCIATION, SAN MATEO CHAPTER,
21
22
23
24
NEYHART,
ANDERSON,
FLYNN
&
GROSBOLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
25
Case No. 11-cv-6217 EMC
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ENGELHART ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.,
an entity,
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Case No. 11-cv-6217 EMC
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and/or their
respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice
against Defendant ENGELHART ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., pursuant to the Federal Rules of
4
5
6
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). It is further stipulated that each party will bear all of its own
attorneys’ fees and costs.
Respectfully submitted,
7
8
9
Dated: February 25, 2014
NEYHART, ANDERSON,
FLYNN & GROSBOLL
10
11
12
13
By: _/s/ Chloe Quail________________
Attorney for Plaintiffs
SWEENEY, MASON, WILSON &
BOSOMWORTH
14
15
16
By: _/s/ Roger Mason________________
Attorney for Defendants
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
NEYHART,
ANDERSON,
FLYNN
&
GROSBOLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Case No. 11-cv-6217 EMC
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED that United States District Court Case Number 11-cv-6217 is hereby
4
DISMISSED without prejudice.
13
R NIA
FO
ER
H
12
RT
11
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
NO
10
VED
_____________________________________
APPRO
LI
9
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
2/25
Dated: ____________, 2014
S
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
NEYHART,
ANDERSON,
FLYNN
&
GROSBOLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Case No. 11-cv-6217 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?