Gardner v. RTC Grounds

Filing 3

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; GRANTING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/21/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

GILBERT GARDNER,

11

Petitioner,

12
13

vs.
R. GROUNDS, Warden,

14

Respondent.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C 11-6226 JSW (PR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE;
GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS

(Docket No. 2)

16
INTRODUCTION

17
18
19
20
21
22

Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of California proceeding pro se, has filed a
habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the constitutionality of
his state court conviction. This order directs Respondent to show cause why the petition
should not be granted, and grants Petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis.
BACKGROUND

23
24
25
26
27
28

In 2010, Petitioner was convicted in San Francisco County Superior Court of
second-degree burglary and resisting arrest. The trial court sentenced him to a term of
seven years in state prison. Earlier this year, the California Court of Appeal affirmed and
the California Supreme Court denied a petition for review. The instant petition was filed

on December 13, 2011.

1
2

DISCUSSION
I

3

Standard of Review
This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a

4

person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is

5

in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28

6

U.S.C. § 2254(a). It shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to

7

show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that

8

the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” Id. § 2243.

9

II

Legal Claims

10

Petitioner claims that: (1) he was denied his right to self-representation; and (2)

11

there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for resisting arrest. Liberally

12

construed, these claims are sufficient to warrant a response from Respondent.

13

CONCLUSION

14

For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown,

15

1. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition, and

16

all attachments thereto, on Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General

17

of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on Petitioner.

18

2. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner, within ninety (90)

19

days of the issuance of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the

20

Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should

21

not be granted. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on Petitioner a copy of all

22

portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant

23

to a determination of the issues presented by the petition. If Petitioner wishes to respond

24

to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on

25

Respondent within thirty (30) days of the date the answer is filed.

26
27
28

3. Respondent may, within ninety (90) days, file a motion to dismiss on
procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to

2

1

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion,

2

Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of

3

non-opposition within thirty (30) days of the date the motion is filed, and Respondent

4

shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of the date

5

any opposition is filed.

6

4. It is Petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep

7

the Court informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper captioned “Notice

8

of Change of Address.” He must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely fashion.

9

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
5. The application to proceed in forma pauperis (docket number 2) is
GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 21, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

GILBERT GARDNER,

Case Number: CV11-06226 JSW

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

7
8
9
10

v.
R.T.C. GROUNDS et al,
Defendant.

/

11
12
13
14
15

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on December 21, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

16
17

19

Gilbert A. Gardner
AD5609
CTF-Soledad
P.O. Box 686
Soledad, CA 93960

20

Dated: December 21, 2011

18

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk