Overton v. Overton
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/27/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MICHAEL LOUIS OVERTON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
TRUST OFFICE, CALIFORNIA
MEDICAL FACILITY,
11
Defendant.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 11-6233 WHA (PR)
12
/
13
14
On December 13, 2011, plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of California, filed a
15
motion complaining of actions by prison employees. That day, the clerk notified
16
plaintiff that he had not filed a complaint, and that he had neither paid the filing fee nor
17
filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Along with the notices, the
18
clerk mailed to plaintiff the court’s complaint and IFP forms, instructions for completing
19
the forms, and a stamped return envelope. In the notices, plaintiff was informed that the
20
case would be dismissed if he did not file a complaint, and pay the fee or file a
21
completed IFP application, within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed, and
22
plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, this case is
23
DISMISSED without prejudice. The motion for settlement (docket number 1) is DENIED
24
as moot. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: January
27
, 2012.
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.11\OVERTON6233.DFP.wpd
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?