NanoEn Tek, Inc. et al v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Filing
80
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 79 CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/21/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)
Case3:11-cv-06237-JSW Document79 Filed05/18/12 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
Clinton J. McCord, SBN 204749; cmccord@edwardswildman.com
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
9665 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone No.: 310-860-8700
Fax No.: 310-860-3800
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff NANOENTEK, INC.
(Additional Attorneys listed on signature page)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RONALD F. LOPEZ, SBN 111756; rflopez@nixonpeabody.com
NIXON PEABODY
One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3600
Telephone: (415) 984-8200
Facsimile: (415) 984-8300
ROBERT E. KREBS, SBN 057526; rkrebs@nixonpeabody.com
JENNIFER HAYES, SBN 241533; jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com
NIXON PEABODY LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone: (650) 320-7700
Facsimile: (650) 320-7701
14
Attorneys for Defendant BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
NANOENTEK, INC.,
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:11-CV-06237 JSW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE
vs.
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.,
Defendant.
23
24
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff NanoEnTek, Inc. (“NanoEnTek”) and Defendant Bio-Rad
26
Laboratories, Inc. (“Bio-Rad”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby
27
STIPULATE AND AGREE, to consent to have Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero conduct any
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE
3:11-CV-06237-JSW
Case3:11-cv-06237-JSW Document79 Filed05/18/12 Page2 of 4
1
and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a final judgment.
2
Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the
3
Federal Circuit.
4
5
6
DATED: May 18, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
7
____/s/ Adam Samansky__________________
Clinton J. McCord, SBN 204749
George W. Neuner (admitted pro hac vice)
gneuner@edwardswildman.com
David Cotta (admitted pro hac vice)
dcotta@edwardswildman.com
Adam Samansky (admitted pro hac vice)
asamansky@edwardswildman.com
Peter Cuomo (admitted pro hac vice)
pcuomo@edwardswildman.com
Deborah Higashi Dodge (admitted pro hac vice)
ddodge@edwardswildman.com
EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP
111 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02199-7613
Telephone No.: 617-239-0100
Fax No.: 617-227-4420
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NANOENTEK, INC.
17
18
19
DATED: May 18, 2012
NIXON PEABODY LLP
___/s/ Jennifer Hayes___________________
Ronald F. Lopez, SBN 111756
One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3600
Telephone: (415) 984-8200
Facsimile: (415) 984-8300
20
21
22
23
Robert E. Krebs SBN 057526
Jennifer Hayes SBN 241533
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 500
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone: (650) 320-7700
Facsimile: (650) 320-7701
24
25
26
27
Attorneys for Defendant
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE
-2-
3:11-CV-06237-JSW
Case3:11-cv-06237-JSW Document79 Filed05/18/12 Page3 of 4
1
2
3
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that
all parties have concurred in the filing of this JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
4
ORDER.
5
6
DATED: May 18, 2012
/s/ Jennifer Hayes
Jennifer Hayes
7
8
Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 73-1(b) and the parties’consent, this matter is
HEREBY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Spero for all further proceedings
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
DATED:
May 21, 2012
Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE
-3-
3:11-CV-06237-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?