Infineon Technologies AG v. Volterra Semiconductor Corporation

Filing 101

ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE INSUFFICIENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO STAY DISCOVERY, DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER TIME, AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO ALTER / COUNTER-MOTION TO ALTER INVALIDITY CONTENTION DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 11, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C 11-6239 MMC v. VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Defendant. 15 16 17 / ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE INSUFFICIENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO STAY DISCOVERY, DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER TIME, AND DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO ALTER / COUNTER-MOTION TO ALTER INVALIDITY CONTENTION DEADLINE 18 19 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, (1) defendant’s “Motion to Strike Insufficient 20 Infringement Contentions and to Stay Discovery,” filed July 6, 2012, (2) defendant’s 21 “Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,” also filed July 6, 2012, (3) plaintiff’s “Motion to 22 Strike,” filed July 9, 2012, (4) plaintiff’s “Motion to Alter Time,” filed July 10, 2012, and (5) 23 defendant’s “Response to Plaintiff Infineon Technologies AG’s Motion to Alter Time and 24 Counter-Motion to Alter the Current Deadline for Volterra to Provide its Invalidity 25 Contentions,” filed July 11, 2012,1 are hereby REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Donna M. 26 Ryu, to whom all discovery matters previously were referred. 27 1 28 Because the timing and merits of the other filings referenced above likely will bear on the merits of defendant’s counter-motion, the Court finds Magistrate Judge Ryu is in the best position to rule on said counter-motion. 1 2 3 The parties will be advised of the next appearance, if any, by Magistrate Judge Ryu’s chambers. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: July 11, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?