Infineon Technologies AG v. Volterra Semiconductor Corporation

Filing 211

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(A). The Case Management Conference is hereby continued from March 15, 2013 to May 3, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney March 11, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)

1 DAVID G. WILLE (Pro Hac Vice) (TX Bar No. 08945388)
JEFFERY D. BAXTER (Pro Hac Vice) (TX Bar No. 24006816)
2 AARON DAVIDSON (Pro Hac Vice) (TX Bar No. 24007080)
SAMIR A. BHAVSAR (Pro Hac Vice) (TX Bar No. 00798065)
3
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
4 2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75201
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6 E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
7
E-mail: [e-mail]
8 E-mail: [e-mail]
9 STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 058452)
JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346)
10 CHRISTOPHER A. WIMMER (SBN 263275)
11 TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP
One Ferry Building, Suite 355
12 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
13 Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
14 E-mail: [e-mail]
15 E-mail: [e-mail]
16 Attorneys for Plaintiff
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, a
21 German corporation,
22

Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant,

23
24

vs.

VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR
25 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
26
TAYLOR & CO.

27

Case No. CV-11-6239 (MMC) (DMR)
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE
6-2(a)
Judge:
Complaint Filed:

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
January 21, 2010

Defendant and
Counterclaimant.

LAW OFFICES, LLP

28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2(a): CASE NO. CV-11-06239 (MMC) (DMR)

1

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG (“Infineon”) and

2 Defendant and Counterclaimant VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
3 (“Volterra”) (collectively “the Parties”) have conferred by and through their counsel and pursuant
4 to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and subject to the Court’s approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS
5 FOLLOWS:
6

WHEREAS, on January 7, 2013, the Parties filed a Joint Status Report (ECF 178);

7

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2013, in light of the Parties’ Joint Status Report and the fact

8 that disputes regarding the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s infringement contention remained unresolved,
9 this Court determined that it was premature to set a revised claim construction schedule (ECF
10 188);
11

WHEREAS, in that same order, this Court advanced the Case Management Conference in

12 this case from April 19, 2013 to March 15, 2013;
13

WHEREAS, the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s infringement contentions remains unresolved

14 and Defendant is in the process of filing a further motion to challenge the adequacy of those
15 contentions, which will be set for hearing on April 11, 2013;
16

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has filed a Motion For Leave To Amend Its Infringement

17 Contentions To Add Additional Model Numbers which is presently set for hearing on April 11,
18 2013;
19

WHEREAS, the Parties believe it important to have issues with respect to Plaintiff’s

20 infringement contentions resolved before scheduling issues are considered by the Court; and
21
22

WHEREAS, set forth below are the previous time modifications in this case:
(a)

Stipulation and Order regarding date by which Volterra may answer, move

23 or otherwise plead in response to complaint extended to March 16, 2010 (ECF No. 8);
24

(b)

Stipulation and Order Extending Response and Hearing Dates re Plaintiff’s

25 Motion for Leave to Amend Its Infringement Contentions to Add Additional Model Numbers
26 (ECF No. 202).
27
28
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

2.
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2(a): CASE NO. CV-11-06239 (MMC) (DMR)

1 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby propose, stipulate and agree as follows, by and through
2 their respective counsel of record, and subject to the Court’s approval, that:
3

1.

The Case Management Conference in the above-captioned action, currently

4

scheduled to take place on March 15, 2013 at 10:30 a.m., shall be continued to a date

5

convenient for the Court after April 11, 2013,; and

6

2.

Within 7 days prior to such conference, the Parties shall submit to the Court a Joint

7

Case Management Conference Statement or to further alert the Court that issues with

8

respect to the Plaintiff’s infringement contentions remain unsettled.

9
10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11

Respectfully submitted,

12 Dated: March 7, 2013

TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES, LLP

13
14
/s/Jonathan A. Patchen
Jonathan A. Patchen
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
By:

15
16
17
18
19
Dated: March 7, 2012

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

20
21
22
23

/s/ Jeffrey M. Fisher
Jeffrey M. Fisher
Attorneys for Defendant VOLTERRA
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
By:

24
25
26
27
28
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

3.
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2(a): CASE NO. CV-11-06239 (MMC) (DMR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2 Pursuant to the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the Case Management
3 Conference is hereby CONTINUED from March 15, 2013 to May 3, 2013.
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 DATED: March 11, 2013

_______________________________________

7

HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

8

SENIOR DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TAYLOR & CO.
LAW OFFICES, LLP

4.
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2(a): CASE NO. CV-11-06239 (MMC) (DMR)