Infineon Technologies AG v. Volterra Semiconductor Corporation

Filing 299

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 10, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

EDWARD R. REINES (Bar No. 135960)
[e-mail]
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
[e-mail]
ANNE CAPPELLA (Bar No. 181402)
[e-mail]
JUSTIN M. LEE (Bar No. 268310)
[e-mail]
BLAKE R. DAVIS (Bar No. 294360)
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10

Attorneys for Defendant
Volterra Semiconductor Corporation

11
12
13
14
15

DAVID G. WILLE (Pro Hac Vice) (TX Bar
No. 08945388)
JEFFERY D. BAXTER (Pro Hac Vice) (TX
Bar No. 24006816)
AARON DAVIDSON (Pro Hac Vice) (TX Bar
No. 24007080)
SAMIR A. BHAVSAR (Pro Hac Vice) (TX
Bar No. 00798065)
BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR (SBN 058452)
JONATHAN A. PATCHEN (SBN 237346)
CHRISTOPHER A. WIMMER (SBN 263275)
TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW OFFICES,
LLP
One Ferry Building, Suite 355
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

16
Attorneys for Plaintiff Infineon Technologies
AG

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG,

22
23
24
25
26

Case No. CV-11-6239 (MMC)

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER AMENDING PROTECTIVE
ORDER

vs.
VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION,
Defendant.

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. CV-11-6239 (MMC)

1

WHEREAS the Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order on July 17, 2012 (D.I. 104);

2

WHEREAS the parties wish to amend the Stipulated Protective Order to provide

3

additional specificity as to the procedure and timeline for designating materials and addressing

4

requests for access to designated material to ensure that the designation of protected materials

5

does not unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process;

6
7

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the
approval of the Court, the following provisions shall be added to the Stipulated Protective Order:

8

5.2 . . .

9

(d)

Any designation of Protected Material shall specify which party’s

10

confidential information is disclosed. For production documents (i.e., a party’s documents

11

produced in response to a discovery request), that identification need not be affixed to

12

each specific document but shall be provided simultaneously with the production (e.g., by

13

cover letter accompanying a document production).

14

7.5

15

Material shall substantively respond to any reasonable request as to the scope of a designation,

16

request for redaction, or request for re- or de-designation of Protected Material within two (2)

17

business days. Any request for access to designated materials under this paragraph shall be made

18

in good faith, and not to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to

19

impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties.

Requests for Access to Designated Materials. A party that has designated Protected

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

CASE NO. CV-11-6239 (MMC)

1

Dated: April 8, 2014

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

2
3

By:

4
5
6

Dated: April 8, 2014

/s/ Sonal N. Mehta
Sonal N. Mehta
Attorneys for Defendant Volterra
Semiconductor Corporation

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

7
8

By:

9
10

/s/ Aaron Davidson
David G. Wille
Aaron Davidson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Infineon Technologies AG

11
ATTESTATION OF E-FILER

12
13

In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), the undersigned ECF user whose identification and

14

password are being used to file this document, hereby attests that all signatories have concurred in

15

the filing of this document.

16

Dated: April 8, 2014

/s/ Sonal N. Mehta
Sonal N. Mehta

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDER

2

CASE NO. CV-11-6239 (MMC)

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following provisions
shall be added to the Stipulated Protective Order in this matter:

4

5.2 . . .

5

(d)

6

confidential information is disclosed. For production documents (i.e., a party’s documents

7

produced in response to a discovery request), that identification need not be affixed to

8

each specific document but shall be provided simultaneously with the production (e.g., by

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Any designation of Protected Material shall specify which party’s

cover letter accompanying a document production).
7.5

Requests for Access to Designated Materials. A party that has designated Protected

Material shall substantively respond to any reasonable request as to the scope of a designation,
request for redaction, or request for re- or de-designation of Protected Material within two (2)
business days. Any request for access to designated materials under this paragraph shall be made
in good faith, and not to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to
impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties.

16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
April 10, 2014
Date: ______________
20
21

______________________________________________
THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDER

3

CASE NO. CV-11-6239 (MMC)