Compucom Systems Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER re (6581 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendants to Respond to CompuCom System, Inc.'s First Amended Complaint filed by Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on August 29, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
CLEVELAND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
B AKER & H OSTETLER LLP
11
13
14
15
Paul P. Eyre
Tracy L. Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: (212) 589-4210
Facsimile: (212) 589-4201
peyre@bakerlaw.com
tcole@bakerlaw.com
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
Erin K. Murdock-Park
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, OH 44114-3482
Telephone: (216) 621-0200
Facsimile: (216) 696-0740
evargo@bakerlaw.com
mmumford@bakerlaw.com
emurdockpark@bakerlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.
and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.
[Additional Defendants and Counsel listed on signature
page]
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates to Individual Case No.
3:11-cv-6241-SI (N.D. Cal.)
22
23
CompuCom Systems, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
24
25
26
v.
AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-6241-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
ANSWER COMPUCOM SYSTEM,
INC.’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Clerk’s Action Required
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPUCOM’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-06241-SI
MDL FILE NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
among others: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America; Chi Mei
4
Optoelectronics Corporation (n/k/a Chimei Innolux Corporation); Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA,
5
Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.; Epson Electronics America, Inc.;
6
Epson Imaging Devices Corporation; HannStar Display Corporation; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi
7
Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display East, Inc.); LG
8
Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.; Mitsui & Co.
9
(U.S.A.), Inc.; NEC Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., NEC Corporation of America,
10
NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, the “NEC
11
Defendants”); Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics
12
CLEVELAND
Amended Complaint (the “FAC”) in the above-captioned action against the following defendants,
3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WHEREAS, on May 8, 2012, plaintiff CompuCom Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a First
2
B AKER & H OSTETLER LLP
1
Corporation; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information
13
Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Corporation; and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd.,
14
(collectively, the “Stipulating CompuCom Defendants”).
15
WHEREAS, the Stipulating CompuCom Defendants filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss the
16
FAC (MDL Dkt. No. 6108), which was granted in part on August 21, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No.
17
6506);
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
WHEREAS the NEC Defendants separately filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC (MDL
Dkt. No. 6114), which was granted in part on August 21, 2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 6506);
WHEREAS, all of the Stipulating CompuCom Defendants desire a reasonable amount of
time to respond to Plaintiff’s FAC; and
WHEREAS, the parties believe that proceeding on a unified response date will create
efficiency for the Court and the parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among
25
Plaintiff and the Stipulating CompuCom Defendants, through their respective counsel, that the
26
Stipulating CompuCom Defendants’ deadline to answer the FAC will be October 12, 2012.
27
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPUCOM’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-06241-SI
MDL FILE NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
1
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
Dated: August 29, 2012
2
3
By: /s/ Erin K. Murdock-Park
Erin K. Murdock-Park
4
Paul P. Eyre
Tracy L. Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: (212) 589-4210
Facsimile: (212) 589-4201
peyre@bakerlaw.com
tcole@bakerlaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
Erin K. Murdock-Park
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, OH 44114-3482
Telephone: (216) 621-0200
Facsimile: (216) 696-0740
evargo@bakerlaw.com
mmumford@bakerlaw.com
emurdockpark@bakerlaw.com
10
12
CLEVELAND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
B AKER & H OSTETLER LLP
11
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants Mitsui & Co.
(Taiwan), Ltd. and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.
17
18
Also on behalf of AU Optronics Corporation,
AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei
Optoelectronics Corporation (n/k/a Chimei
Innolux Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics
USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chunghwa
Picture Tubes, Ltd., Epson Electronics
America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices
Corporation, HannStar Display Corporation,
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices
(USA), Inc., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan
Display East, Inc.); LG Display Co., Ltd., LG
Display America, Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC
LCD Technologies, Ltd., NEC Corporation of
America, NEC Display Solutions of America,
Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., Sanyo
Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp
Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPUCOM’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
2
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-06241-SI
MDL FILE NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
1
Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba
America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba
Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display
Technology Co., Ltd.
2
3
4
5
10
By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno________________
Philip J. Iovieno
Anne Nardacci
Luke Nikas
Christopher Fenlon
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
(518) 434-0600 (Phone)
(518) 434-0665 (Facsimile)
piovieno@bsfllp.com
11
Counsel for Plaintiff CompuCom Systems, Inc.
6
7
8
12
CLEVELAND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
B AKER & H OSTETLER LLP
9
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPUCOM’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
3
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-06241-SI
MDL FILE NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
1
2
FILER’S ATTESTATION
I, Erin K. Murdock-Park, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being
3
used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that
4
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories above.
5
6
By: /s/ Erin K. Murdock-Park
Erin K. Murdock-Park
7
One of the Attorneys for Defendants Mitsui & Co.
(Taiwan), Ltd. and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.
8
9
10
12
CLEVELAND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
B AKER & H OSTETLER LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPUCOM’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
4
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-06241-SI
MDL FILE NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
2012
August
29
DATED this ___ day of _____________, _____.
4
5
By: _______________________________________
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON
6
7
8
9
10
12
CLEVELAND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
B AKER & H OSTETLER LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPUCOM’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
5
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-06241-SI
MDL FILE NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?