Olson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Filing 4

MDL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-43) transferring case to the Northern District of Texas. In Re: Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2244. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 2244 Document 435 Filed 12/28/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO−43) On May 23, 2011, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See 787 F.Supp.2d 1358 (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 220 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to Judge Kinkeade. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of May 23, 2011, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Dec 28, 2011 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2244 Document 435 Filed 12/28/11 Page 2 of 2 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 SCHEDULE CTO−43 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 11−10178 Carl Cossick v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN CAN CAN CAN 3 3 3 3 11−06254 11−06258 11−06259 11−06261 Powell et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Bland et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Krumrine et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Olson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 9 11−00165 Lay et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al 2 11−01982 Goff v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc et al LUMBRA et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al KARABEKIAN v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al TORBERT v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al STAUFFER v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al MONTANA MT NEVADA NV NEW JERSEY NJ 3 11−06408 NJ 3 11−06409 NJ NJ 3 3 11−06410 11−06871 NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 11−08465 Marino et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN WVS 3 11−00847 Vickers v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?