Murphy v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Filing
4
ORDER DENYING 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/19/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 11-06267 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS,
13
ORDER DENYING
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND
DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
The Court has received Plaintiff’s complaint and application to proceed in forma
17
pauperis, both filed in this Court on December 13, 2011. The Court may authorize a plaintiff
18
to file an action in federal court without prepayment of fees or security if the plaintiff submits
19
an affidavit showing that he or she is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. 28
20
U.S.C. § 1915(a). The in forma pauperis statute also provides that the Court shall dismiss the
21
case if at any time the Court determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the
22
action (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or
23
(3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C.
24
§ 1915(e)(2).
25
It is impossible to discern from Plaintiff’s complaint many of the essential details of the
26
events giving rise to a claim. It is also impossible to discern whether Plaintiff has adequately
27
exhausted his administrative remedies before the Veterans Affairs tribunal to receive benefits
28
prior to seeking redress before this Court.
1
As such, Plaintiff has failed to set forth “a short and plain statement of the claim
2
showing that the pleader is entitled to relief” as required by Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil
3
Procedure. However, the Court shall afford Plaintiff an opportunity to amend his complaint. If
4
Plaintiff chooses to amend, the Court requests that he include information about the application
5
for benefits, the denial, if any, and the Veterans Claims process he followed.
6
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. If
7
Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must submit a renewed application to
8
proceed in forma pauperis.
9
If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, he must file an amended complaint by January
6, 2012. Failure to file a cognizable legal claim by this date shall result in dismissal of this
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
action with prejudice. The Court advises Plaintiff that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which
12
contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through the
13
Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiff that additional
14
assistance may be available by making an appointment with the Legal Help Center, which is
15
located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Room 2796, San Francisco, California, 94102.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: December 19, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR,
Case Number: CV11-06267 JSW
6
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
v.
8
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
9 et al,
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
13
That on December 19, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
14 placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
15 inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
Shannon O. Murphy
18 General Delivery
Richmond, CA 94801
19
Dated: December 19, 2011
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?