Smith et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc et al
Filing
13
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES re 8 MOTION to Remand filed by Patricia Smith, Donald Smith. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 1/17/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
Northern District of California
4
5
DONALD SMITH
6
No. C 11-06270 MEJ
Plaintiff(s),
v.
7
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS
8
9
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS
TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL
ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S
STANDING ORDERS
Defendant(s).
_____________________________________/
10
On January 11, 2012, Plaintiffs electronically filed a Motion to Remand. Dkt. No. 8.
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
However, Plaintiffs failed to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders by not
13
delivering to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day that the
14
papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically . . .
15
marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and
16
‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Case Management Standing
17
Order, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, ¶ 6. Plaintiffs shall immediately submit a chambers
18
copy of the above-referenced documents. ALL CHAMBERS COPIES MUST INCLUDE: (1)
19
ON EACH PAGE THE RUNNING HEADER CREATED BY THE ECF SYSTEM, AND (2)
20
ALL EXHIBITS WITH LABELED TAB DIVIDERS.
21
In addition, Plaintiffs shall submit (but not e-file) a declaration which attests that: (1) the
22
party read this Order in its entirety; and (2) the submitted chambers copies include the running
23
header created by the ECF system and all exhibits with label tab dividers for each exhibit.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: January 17, 2012
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?