Knight v. Aqui et al
Filing
77
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 Stipulation filed by William E. Knight, Diane Aqui. Status Conference set for 2/5/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
Michael Cohen - #98066
Bruce E. Krell, Inc. - #52542
Jerome M. Garchik - #50562
LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE E. KRELL
Grove Law Building
345 Grove Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
415/861-4414
Fax: 415/431-4526
mikecohen@sprintmail.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
WILLIAM E. KNIGHT,
11
No. CV 11 6337 - JST
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE COMPLIANCE
HEARING TO FEBRUARY 5, 2014, PROPOSED
ORDER THEREON
12
vs.
13
DIANE AQUI, MARK D. JORDAN,
Deceased, ESTATE OF MARK. D.
JORDAN, and DOES 1-100,
14
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
Stipulation
18
Because the Settlement Agreement between the parties includes an installment payment
19
due by 1/15/14 as a final act, the parties request that the compliance hearing, currently set for
20
December 5, 2013, be continued to February 5, 2014.
21
DATED: November 6, 2013
22
LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE E. KRELL, INC.
By
/S/
Michael Cohen
23
DATED: November _, 2013
ROECA HAAS HAGER LLP
24
By
25
26
/S/
Edward Haas
//
1
Stipulation to Continue Compliance Hearing to February 5, 2014, Proposed Order Thereon
1
Proposed Order
The Court having read and considered the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the compliance hearing, currently set for Dcember 5, 2013, be,
4
and it hereby is, continued to February 5, 2014.
5
DATED: November 8, 2013
UNIT
ED
ERED
ER
H
10
11
. Ti ga r
LI
RT
9
nS
J u d ge J o
FO
NO
8
R NIA
JUDGE OF THES SO ORD
I DISTRICT COURT
HON. JON ITTIGAR
S.
A
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
6
S
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Stipulation to Continue Compliance Hearing to February 5, 2014, Proposed Order Thereon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?