Transfresh Corporation v. Ganzerla & Associates, Inc. et al
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING re 38 STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Transfresh Corporation and as to 31 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6). Motion Hearing re-set for 10/5/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Further Case Management Conference fe-set for 10/5/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/20/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
Case3:11-cv-06348-JCS Document38 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
E. Lynn Perry (CA Bar 115165)
PERRY IP GROUP A LAW CORPORATION
900 Larkspur Landing Circle Ste 226
Larkspur, CA 94939
415-524-8683 (tel.)
415-524-8685 (fax)
lperry@perryip.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TRANSFRESH CORPORATION
Keith G. Bremer (State Bar No. 155920)
kbremer@bremerandwhyte.com
Jeremy Johnson (State Bar No. 214989)
jjohnson@,bremerandwhyte.com
Michael Shen (State Bar No. 228361)
mshen@,bremerandwhyte.com
BREMER WHYTE BROWN & O'MEARA LLP
20320 S.W. Birch Street
Second Floor
Newport Beach, California 92660
Telephone: (949) 221-1000
Facsimile: (949) 221-1001
Attorneys for Defendants,
GANZERLA & ASSOCIATES, INC. dba
PEAKFRESH USA
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
TRANSFRESH CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation,
21
22
23
24
25
26
C 11-06348 JCS
Plaintiff,
19
20
Case No.
v.
GANZERLA & ASSOCIATES, INC., a
California corporation, also doing business as
PEAKFRESH USA,
Defendant.
THIRD STIPULATED MOTION
TO RESCHEDULE JOINT CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE and
HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Place:
October 5, 2012
9:30 a.m.
Hon. JOSEPH C. SPERO
Courtroom G, 15th Floor
The parties in the captioned case attended a court-connected mediation on June 12, 2012. As a
result, the parties are in earnest settlement negotiations, being facilitated by the mediator. The parties
27
have exchanged several drafts and have made substantial progress with three additional conferences
28
Case3:11-cv-06348-JCS Document38 Filed08/09/12 Page2 of 3
1
with the mediator. The parties have an additional conference with the mediator scheduled August 23,
2
2012, and it is believe that the negotiations will necessarily not be concluded by the scheduled
3
conference date. Presently, the Case Management Conference and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to
4
Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaim is set for August 31, 2012 at 9:30 a.m., and the Joint Case
5
6
Management Conference Statement is due August 24, 2012. Therefore, Plaintiff TRANSFRESH
7
CORPORATION and Defendant GANZERLA & ASSOCIATES, INC. dba PEAKFRESH USA move
8
the Court to reschedule the Case Management Conference to October 5, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. to
9
accommodate this schedule.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THIRD STIPULATED MOTION TO RESCHEDULE
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-2-
Case3:11-cv-06348-JCS Document38 Filed08/09/12 Page3 of 3
1
Dated:
August 9, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
2
PERRY IP GROUP A.L.C
3
4
/S/
E. Lynn Perry
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TRANSFRESH CORPORATION
6
7
Dated:
August __, 2012
8
BREMER WHYTE BROWN &
O'MEARA LLP
/S/
Michael Shen
9
Attorneys for Defendants
10
GANZERLA & ASSOCIATES, INC. dba
PEAKFRESH USA and GREGORY A.
GANZERLA
11
12
DRAFT ORDER
13
14
For the reasons stated in the foregoing Stipulated Motion, the Case Management Conference
15
and hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaim is hereby rescheduled to
16
October 5, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. 1:30 PM.
S
8/20/12
Date: _______________
R NIA
UNIT
ED
18
______________________________________
Joseph C. Spero seph C. Spero
e Jo
United States Judg
Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THIRD STIPULATED MOTION TO RESCHEDULE
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-3-
A
H
ER
LI
RT
20
FO
NO
19
RT
U
O
17
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?