Purvis v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/27/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Angela M. Taylor (State Bar No. 210425) JONES DAY 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 851-3939 Facsimile: (949) 553-7539 angelataylor@jonesday.com Attorney for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Stephanie B. Purvis, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, and Trans Union, LLC, 16 Defendants. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 11-06352 RS STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER [CIVIL L.R. 6-1; 6-2; 7-12] 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Stephanie Purvis (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants 21 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), Equifax Information Services LLC 22 (“Equifax”), and Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through 23 their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Court’s April 19, 2012 24 Scheduling Order in this Matter (Docket No. 33), to extend the discovery cut-off and pretrial 25 deadlines by 45 days. 26 The current discovery deadlines in this case are as follows: 27 1. Discovery cutoff date: January 18, 2013, 28 2. Expert Witness Reports due February 8, 2013, IRI-45952v1 1 3. Rebuttal Expert Witness Reports due March 1, 2013, 2 4. Expert witness discovery to be completed by March 22, 2013, and 3 5. All pretrial motions shall be heard by April 18, 2013. 4 5 The parties are requesting a 45 day extension, which would make the new deadlines as follows: 6 1. Discovery cutoff date: March 4, 2013, 7 2. Expert Witness Reports due March 25, 2013, 8 3. Rebuttal Expert Witness Reports due April 15, 2013, 9 4. Expert witness discovery to be completed by May 6, 2013, and 10 11 5. All pretrial motions shall be heard by May 30, 2013. The Parties are currently engaged in written discovery and are scheduling depositions. 12 Experian’s 30(b)(6) witness is currently out on medical leave, after undergoing back surgery in 13 December 2012. Although it was originally anticipated that Experian’s witness would be 14 returning to work in early January 2013, it now appears that Experian’s witness will not be 15 returning to work until late January 2013. A 45 day extension of the discovery and pretrial 16 deadlines will give the parties additional time to schedule and conduct Experian’s 30(b)(6) 17 deposition. 18 The Parties have not previously requested any time modifications from the Court. The 19 Parties are not seeking to reschedule the further Case Management Conference currently 20 scheduled for January 31, 2013 at 10:00 am. 21 22 23 As such, the Parties respectfully request a 45 day extension the of discovery and pretrial deadlines as indicated above. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 25 26 27 28 IRI-45952v1 -2- 1 Dated: December 27, 2012 JONES DAY 2 3 By: /s/ Angela M. Taylor Angela M. Taylor 4 Attorney for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 5 6 7 Dated: December 27, 2012 ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Mark F. Anderson Mark F. Anderson 10 Attorney for Plaintiff Stephanie Purvis 11 12 13 Dated: December 27, 2012 KING & SPALDING LLP 14 By: /s/ Lewis P. Perling Lewis P. Perling 15 16 Attorney for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC 17 18 19 Dated: December 27, 2012 SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 20 By: /s/ Robert J. Schuckit Robert J. Schuckit 21 22 Attorney for Defendant Trans Union LLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 IRI-45952v1 -3- 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO 3 4 5 ORDERED Dated: December 27 2012 , IT IS SO ORDERED 6 7 HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IRI-45952v1 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?