Purvis v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/27/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Angela M. Taylor (State Bar No. 210425)
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone:
(949) 851-3939
Facsimile:
(949) 553-7539
angelataylor@jonesday.com
Attorney for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Stephanie B. Purvis,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.,
Equifax Information Services LLC, and
Trans Union, LLC,
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 11-06352 RS
STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE
SCHEDULING ORDER;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
[CIVIL L.R. 6-1; 6-2; 7-12]
19
20
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Stephanie Purvis (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants
21
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), Equifax Information Services LLC
22
(“Equifax”), and Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through
23
their undersigned attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to modify the Court’s April 19, 2012
24
Scheduling Order in this Matter (Docket No. 33), to extend the discovery cut-off and pretrial
25
deadlines by 45 days.
26
The current discovery deadlines in this case are as follows:
27
1. Discovery cutoff date: January 18, 2013,
28
2. Expert Witness Reports due February 8, 2013,
IRI-45952v1
1
3. Rebuttal Expert Witness Reports due March 1, 2013,
2
4. Expert witness discovery to be completed by March 22, 2013, and
3
5. All pretrial motions shall be heard by April 18, 2013.
4
5
The parties are requesting a 45 day extension, which would make the new deadlines as
follows:
6
1. Discovery cutoff date: March 4, 2013,
7
2. Expert Witness Reports due March 25, 2013,
8
3. Rebuttal Expert Witness Reports due April 15, 2013,
9
4. Expert witness discovery to be completed by May 6, 2013, and
10
11
5. All pretrial motions shall be heard by May 30, 2013.
The Parties are currently engaged in written discovery and are scheduling depositions.
12
Experian’s 30(b)(6) witness is currently out on medical leave, after undergoing back surgery in
13
December 2012. Although it was originally anticipated that Experian’s witness would be
14
returning to work in early January 2013, it now appears that Experian’s witness will not be
15
returning to work until late January 2013. A 45 day extension of the discovery and pretrial
16
deadlines will give the parties additional time to schedule and conduct Experian’s 30(b)(6)
17
deposition.
18
The Parties have not previously requested any time modifications from the Court. The
19
Parties are not seeking to reschedule the further Case Management Conference currently
20
scheduled for January 31, 2013 at 10:00 am.
21
22
23
As such, the Parties respectfully request a 45 day extension the of discovery and pretrial
deadlines as indicated above.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
24
25
26
27
28
IRI-45952v1
-2-
1
Dated: December 27, 2012
JONES DAY
2
3
By: /s/ Angela M. Taylor
Angela M. Taylor
4
Attorney for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.
5
6
7
Dated: December 27, 2012
ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Mark F. Anderson
Mark F. Anderson
10
Attorney for Plaintiff
Stephanie Purvis
11
12
13
Dated: December 27, 2012
KING & SPALDING LLP
14
By: /s/ Lewis P. Perling
Lewis P. Perling
15
16
Attorney for Defendant
Equifax Information Services LLC
17
18
19
Dated: December 27, 2012
SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
20
By: /s/ Robert J. Schuckit
Robert J. Schuckit
21
22
Attorney for Defendant
Trans Union LLC
23
24
25
26
27
28
IRI-45952v1
-3-
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO
3
4
5
ORDERED
Dated: December 27 2012
,
IT IS SO ORDERED
6
7
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IRI-45952v1
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?