Fabozzi v. StubHub, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Defendant's deadline to respond is February 17, 2012. Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition to any motion to dismiss is March 9, 2012. Defendant's deadline to file a reply to any opposition to its motion to dismiss is March 16, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 19, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

David J. Lender (pro hac vice pending)
Eric S. Hochstadt (pro hac vice pending)
Kristen M. Echemendia (pro hac vice pending)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650)
Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Defendants StubHub, Inc.

8
9
10

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18

JOSEPH FABOZZI, on behalf of himself and
those similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

19
20

vs.

Case No. 3:11-cv-6387 (EDL)
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

21
22
23

STUBHUB, INC.,
Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

Case No.: 3:11-cv-6387 (EDL)

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) and this stipulation, defendant

2

StubHub, Inc. (“Defendant”) hereby requests that the Court extend the deadline for Defendant to

3

file a response to plaintiff Joseph Fabozzi’s (“Plaintiff”) Class Action Complaint to February 17,

4

2012, with Plaintiff’s opposition to any motion to dismiss due March 9, 2012 and Defendant’s

5

reply due March 16, 2012.

6
7

1.

2.

10

Complaint, and, therefore, Defendant’s time to respond has not started. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(3).

11
12

WHEREAS Defendant has not been served with the Class Action

Complaint.

8
9

WHEREAS on December 16, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Class Action

3.

WHEREAS, as a condition of this stipulation, counsel will accept service

3.

Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file its answer or a motion to

for Defendant.

13
14

dismiss the Class Action Complaint be scheduled for February 17, 2012. Plaintiff stipulates to

15

this request.

16
17
18
19
20
21

4.

Plaintiff requests that the deadline for him to file an opposition to any

motion to dismiss be scheduled for March 9, 2012. Defendant stipulates to this request.
5.

Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file a reply to any opposition

to its motion to dismiss be scheduled for March 16, 2012. Plaintiff stipulates to this request.
Counsel for Defendant attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for Plaintiff
concurs in the filing of this stipulated request.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

1

Case No.: 3:11-cv-6387 (EDL)

1

DATED:

2

JOSEPH FABOZZI

January 9, 2012
STUBHUB, INC.

3

8
9

By:
/s/ Liani Kotcher
WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650)
Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282)
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

/s/Randall S. Newman
RANDALL S. NEWMAN, P.C.
Randall S. Newman (Cal. Bar No. 190547)
37 Wall Street, Penthouse D
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

4
5
6
7

By:

David J. Lender
(pro hac vice pending)
Eric S. Hochstadt
(pro hac vice pending)
Kristen M. Echemendia
(pro hac vice pending)
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant StubHub, Inc.

17
18
19

[PROPOSED] ORDER

20
21
22

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: January ___, 2012

23

______________________________________
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY

2

Case No.: 3:11-cv-6387 (EDL)