Fabozzi v. StubHub, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 23, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)

1
2
3
4

RANDALL S. NEWMAN, P.C.
Randall S. Newman (Bar No. 190547)
37 Wall Street, Penthouse D
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff,
Joseph Fabozzi

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12

JOSEPH FABOZZI, on behalf of himself and
those similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

vs.
STUBHUB, INC.,
Defendant.

Case No. 11-cv-6387 (MMC)
STIPULATION
TO
EXTEND
PLAINTIFF’S
TIME
TO
FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

17

Current Date: May 11, 2012
Time: 9:00 am
Courtroom: 7 – 19th Floor
Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ADJOURNING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

11-cv-6387 (MMC)

1

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint; and

2

WHEREAS, on January 9, 2011, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Stipulated

3

Request to Extend Defendant’s Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Class Action Complaint whereby

4

the Parties agreed that Defendant’s deadline to file its answer or a motion to dismiss the Class

5

Action Complaint would be February 17, 2012, Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to
6
7

dismiss would be due on March 9, 2012, and Defendant’s reply to any opposition would be due

8

on March 16, 2012; and

9
10

WHEREAS, on February 17, 2012, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Class Action Complaint; and

11

WHEREAS, on March 8, 2012, the parties entered into a stipulation extending the time
12
13

for Plaintiff to file his opposition to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from March 9, 2012 to

14

March 23, 2012 and extending the time for Defendant to file a reply in support of its Motion to

15

Dismiss from March 16, 2012 to March 30, 2012.

16

1.

Plaintiff requests that the deadline for him to file an opposition to Defendant’s

17
18
19
20
21

motion to dismiss be extended from March 23, 2012 to March 26, 2012. Defendant stipulates to
this request.
2.

Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition

to Defendant’s motion to dismiss be extended from March 30, 2012 to April 2, 2012. Plaintiff

22

stipulates to this request.
23
24
25

Counsel for Plaintiff attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for Defendant concurs
in the filing of this stipulated request.

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ADJOURNING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

11-cv-6387 (MMC)

1
2

DATED:

March 23, 2012

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

By:

s/ Randall S. Newman
RANDALL S. NEWMAN, P.C.
Randall S. Newman (Bar No. 190547)
37 Wall Street, Penthouse D
New York, NY 10005
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Joseph Fabozzi

By:

s/ Christopher J. Cox
WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
David J. Lender (pro hac vice)
Eric S. Hochstadt (pro hac vice)
Kristen J. Echemendia (pro hac vice)
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650)
Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282)
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant,
StubHub, Inc.

17
18
19
20

[PROPOSED] ORDER

21

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated: March 23, 2012
24

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ADJOURNING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

11-cv-6387 (MMC)