Aria Diagnostics, Inc v. Sequenom, Inc
Filing
250
ORDER, GRANTING: 248 MOTION to Continue Sequenom's Unopposed Administrative Motion To Continue Briefing Schedule And Hearing Date On Sequenom's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction filed by Sequenom, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 6/27/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/22/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
v.
SEQUENOM, INC.,
Defendant/
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16
ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC.,
17
Counterclaim-Defendant,
18
and
19
ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED,
20
21
Nominal CounterclaimDefendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:11-cv-06391-SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SEQUENOM’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON
SEQUENOM’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
The Honorable Susan Illston
Current Hearing Date: January 17, 2014
Proposed New Hearing Date: June 27, 2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SEQUENOM’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE SEQUENOM’S PI HEARING
Case No. 3:11-cv-06391-SI
1
Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Sequenom, Inc. (“Sequenom”) has moved for an order
2
continuing the briefing schedule and hearing date of Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary
3
injunction related to U.S. Patent No. 6,258,540 (the “’540 patent”). Plaintiff/Counterclaim-
4
Defendant Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.’s (“Ariosa”) does not oppose. The Court, having considered
5
Sequenom’s administrative motion and supporting declaration of Michael J. Malecek, finds good
6
cause to grant the unopposed motion.
7
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Sequenom’s Administrative
8
Motion to Continue Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Sequenom’s Motion for a
9
Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED, and the briefing and hearing date of Sequenom’s Motion
10
11
for a Preliminary Injunction is continued as follows:
1. Sequenom’s opening supplemental brief in support of its motion for a preliminary
12
13
injunction must be filed by Friday, April 11, 2014.
2. Depositions of Sequenom’s fact and expert witnesses relied on by Sequenom in its
14
opening supplemental brief must be completed by Friday, April 25, 2014.
15
3. Ariosa’s opposition must be filed by Friday, May 9, 2014.
16
4. Depositions of Ariosa’s fact and expert witnesses relied on by Ariosa in its opposition
17
must be completed by Friday, May 23, 2014.
18
5. Sequenom’s reply must be filed by Friday, June 6, 2014.
19
6. The Court will hold a hearing on Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction on
20
Friday, June 27, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
23
24
25
26
Dated:
10/22/13
United States District Judge Susan Illston
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SEQUENOM’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE SEQUENOM’S PI HEARING
Case No. 3:11-cv-06391-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?