Frustere v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 106

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED JUNE 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 25, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

RICHARD A. FRUSTERE,

No. 11-6395 MMC

Plaintiff,

12

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
FILED JUNE 22, 2013

v.
13
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
14

Defendants.

15

/

16
17
18
19

Before the Court are various motions, all filed June 22, 2013 by plaintiff Richard A.
Frustere. The Court addresses each in turn.
1. Plaintiff’s “Motion for the Acceptance by This Honorable Court of Plaintiff’s

20

Written Opposition To Defendant’s (Ref Doc 84) Motion for Sanctions” (“Motion for

21

Acceptance”), by which plaintiff requests the Court consider his opposition, originally filed

22

June 21, 2013 (see Doc. No. 95), to defendant’s motion for sanctions, is hereby DENIED

23

as moot. The Court, in ruling on defendant’s motion for sanctions, has already considered

24

said opposition. (See Order, filed June 21, 2013 at 1:24-25 (expressly noting Court’s

25

consideration of plaintiff’s untimely opposition).)

26

2. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Remove Document Number 95 and Attachments Submitted

27

in Error” is hereby DENIED. As noted above, the Court has considered said filing in its

28

order of June 21, 2013. (See id.)

1

3. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Remove Document 99 and Attachments Submitted in Error,”

2

by which plaintiff seeks to remove an earlier-filed, incomplete version of the above-

3

referenced Motion for Acceptance, is hereby GRANTED.

4

4. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Allow Exchange of Discovery, Depositions, Interrogatories et

5

al Which Are a Part of the Judicial Process” and “Motion for a Forensic Accounting

6

Performed by an Independent Court Appointed Professional Such as Rust Consulting” are

7

hereby DENIED as untimely and moot, the Court’s order of dismissal having been filed

8

June 21, 2013, and judgment thereon having been entered.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated: June 25, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2