Frustere v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 37

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action ("Intentional Misrepresentation") is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff's Eighth Cause of Action ("Negligence") is dismissed without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than August 17, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 13, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 RICHARD A. FRUSTERE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. C 11-6395 MMC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., BRENDAN MURPHY, individually and as trustee of the MURPHY FAMILY TRUST, and DOES 1 TO 100, 16 Defendants. / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) Motion to Dismiss, filed May 23, 2012. Plaintiff Richard Frustere (“Frustere”) has filed opposition, to which defendant has replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing July 13, 2012. Jason M. Richardson appeared on behalf of Wells Fargo. Mary Catherine Wiederhold appeared on behalf of Frustere. Having read and considered the parties’ respective written submissions, and for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the Court hereby GRANTED, as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action (“Intentional Misrepresentation”) is dismissed with leave to amend. 2. Plaintiff’s Eighth Cause of Action (“Negligence”) is dismissed without leave to amend. 1 2 3 3. Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than August 17, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: July 13, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?