Frustere v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 62

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 No. 11-6395 MMC RICHARD A. FRUSTERE, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. / 17 18 Before the Court is plaintiff Richard A. Frustere’s Motion for Permission for 19 Electronic Case Filing, filed November 13, 2012, by which plaintiff requests leave to file 20 documents in the above-titled action electronically. 21 Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request is hereby GRANTED, on condition that 22 plaintiff first register as an Electronic Case Filing User on the court’s website. Specifically, 23 plaintiff must follow the registration procedure set forth on the court’s website at 24 Once plaintiff completes the 25 registration procedure and receives an e-filing password from the ECF Help Desk, plaintiff 26 shall electronically file a notice stating he has received his e-filing password. If such notice 27 is filed, the Court will assign the case to the Electronic Case Filing Program, pursuant to 28 General Order No. 45. Other than the notice referred to above, all documents shall be filed 1 on paper unless and until the Court assigns the above-titled case to the Electronic Case 2 Filing Program. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?