Sowinski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Deadline re Dispositive Motions and Trial Dates. Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 01/31/2014. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2014)

Download PDF
Robert A. Bailey (#214688) rbailey@afrct.com ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN, 2 CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP 199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600 3 Pasadena, California 91101-2459 Telephone: (626) 535-1900 4 Facsimile: (626) 577-7764 1 5 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 6 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RICHARD SOWINSKI, Case No.: 3:11-cv-06431-SC 11 [The Honorable Samuel Conti] 12 Plaintiff, vs. THIRD STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR HEARING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND TO CONTINUE TRIAL [L.R. 6-2] 13 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND DOES 1-10, 14 Defendants. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED 16 17 18 THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL STIPULATE 19 PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 AS FOLLOWS 20 Whereas, on July 26, 2013, this Court issued its case management order setting a 21 Discovery Cutoff date of January 10, 2013, the Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions for 22 February 7, 2014 and trial for March 17, 2014. 23 Whereas, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo”) has propounded written 24 discovery and requests for production of documents on Plaintiff. 25 Whereas, although Plaintiff has agreed to produce documents he has not yet done so. 26 Whereas, Wells Fargo properly noticed the depositions of Plaintiff and Mrs. Sowinski to 27 take place on December 10, 2013. However, on December 5, 2013 Plaintiff’s counsel advised 28 Wells Fargo that Plaintiff and Mrs. Sowinski were too ill to proceed with their depositions. 93000/BR0123/00804276-1 1 CASE NO.: 3:11-CV-06431-SC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DATES 1 Plaintiff’s counsel also advised that he represents Mrs. Sowinski. 2 Whereas, as a result of Plaintiff’s and Mrs. Sowinski’s failure to attend their deposition 3 and provide discovery, the Parties stipulated to continue the date by which Wells Fargo could 4 complete discovery as well as the deadline for hearing dispositive motions. On December 6, 5 2013 the Court entered an order extending Wells Fargo’s discovery cutoff to January 24, 2014 6 and the date by which dispositive motions must be heard to February 21, 2014. (Dkt #64). A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 Whereas, Plaintiff’s counsel thereafter provided new dates on which he and his clients 8 would be available for deposition. Based on this information, Wells Fargo properly noticed the 9 depositions of Plaintiff and Mrs. Sowinski for January 14 and January 15, 2014, respectively. 10 On January 13, 2014, Plaintiff’s counsel emailed Wells Fargo’s counsel to advise these 11 depositions could not go forward, this time due to counsel’s illness. The parties therefore 12 entered into another stipulation by which Plaintiff and Mrs. Sowinski would be appear for their 13 depositions on January 24, 2013 and that no further extensions or continuances of the depositions 14 would be made. The Court entered an order to this effect on January 16, 2014 (Dkt. #68). 15 Whereas, despite this order, Plaintiff’s counsel emailed Wells Fargo’s counsel on January 16 22, 2014 at 9:25 p.m. to advise that his clients would not be attending their depositions on 17 January 24, 2014. Plaintiff’s counsel has advised Defendant’s counsel that the reason was the 18 serious illness of Mrs. Sowinski and Dr. Sowinski’s desire and need to assist her and his 19 emotional state at the time. Plaintiff’s counsel has also advised Defendant’s counsel that Mrs. 20 Sowinski is currently hospitalized and undergoing surgery this week. Plaintiff’s counsel has 21 advised Defendant’s counsel that both Dr. and Mrs. Sowinski are in their late seventies and have 22 been married almost fifty years. 23 Whereas, Plaintiff’s counsel has advised Defendant’s counsel that Plaintiff has ordered 24 copies of the relevant documents from the parties holding them (to wit, Plaintiff’s 2005 tax 25 return from the IRS and rent receipts from Plaintiff’s retirement community), Plaintiff’s 26 continuing failure to provide documents and his and Mrs. Sowinski’s failure to participate in 27 depositions have impeded Wells Fargo’s ability to bring a Motion for Summary Judgment and 28 prepare for trial within the timeframe set by the Court’s July 26, 2013 scheduling order, as 93000/BR0123/00804276-1 2 CASE NO.: 3:11-CV-06431-SC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DATES 1 modified by the Court’s December 6, 2013 Order and January 16, 2014 Order. The declaration required by Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. 2 3 WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows: Plaintiff will not present live or written testimony (by declaration or affidavit) of Mrs. 4 5 Sowinski in connection with any motion, trial, or other proceeding in this matter. Plaintiff will appear for deposition in southern California, where the parties’ counsel are 6 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 located, at a mutually convenient time to be determined, but in no event later than ten days prior 8 to the last date for filing of a dispositive motion. All documents will have been provided to 9 Defendant’s counsel no later than ten days prior to such deposition. 10 The deadline by which dispositive motions must be heard is extended to April 18, 2014. 11 The pretrial conference may be rescheduled to May 5, 2014. is vacated. 12 Trial may be continued to May 19, 2014. date is vacated 13 All other dates in the Court’s July 26, 2013 scheduling order as modified by its December 14 6, 2013 Order and January 16, 2014 Order will remain unaffected. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 Dated: January 31, 2013 17 ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN, CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP By: 18 19 /s/ Robert A. Bailey Robert A. Bailey Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 20 Dated: January 31, 2013 GRAHAM & MARTIN 21 By: 22 23 24 /s/ Anthony Graham Anthony Graham Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD SOWINSKI PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED. The pretrial and trial dates are hereby VACATED. Parties shall request new dates after the depositions have been taken. 25 26 Dated: 01/31/2014 Hon. Samuel Conti United States District Judge 27 28 93000/BR0123/00804276-1 3 CASE NO.: 3:11-CV-06431-SC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?