United States Of America v. Asberry

Filing 23

AMENDED ORDER REFERRING DEFENDANT TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT FOR PURPOSES OF REPRESENTATION FOR MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on November 20, 2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 16 Case No.: 11-cv-6531 JSC AMENDED ORDER REFERRING DEFENDANT TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT FOR PURPOSES OF REPRESENTATION FOR MEDIATION JOSEPH N. ASBERRY, a.k.a. JOSEPH ASBERRY, a.k.a. J.N. ASBERRY, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Order amends the Court’s November 19, 2012 Order. Docket No. 22 is VACATED. Upon review of the file in this matter, the Court concludes that it is appropriate to refer the Defendant to the Federal Pro Bono Project to attempt to secure pro bono counsel to represent Defendant for purposes of mediation. Accordingly: 1. The clerk shall forward to the Volunteer Legal Services Program of the Bar Association of San Francisco (“BASF”), one copy of the court file with a notice of referral of the case pursuant to the guidelines of the Federal Pro Bono Project for referral to a volunteer attorney. 1 2. Upon being notified by BASF that an attorney has been located to represent 2 Defendant, that attorney shall be appointed counsel for Defendant in this matter 3 to represent Defendant for purposes of mediation. 4 5 3. Following the appointment of counsel, the Court will refer the matter to the Court’s ADR unit for mediation. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: November 20, 2012 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?