United States Of America v. Asberry

Filing 24

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on December 6, 2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No.: 11-cv-6531 JSC ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL v. 15 16 17 JOSEPH N. ASBERRY, a.k.a. JOSEPH ASBERRY, a.k.a. J.N. ASBERRY, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 Because Defendant Joseph Asberry has requested and is in need of counsel to assist him in this matter and volunteer attorneys are willing to be appointed to undertake this representation, Michael L. Charlson, Hogan Lovells, LLP, 525 University Avenue, 4th Floor 22 23 24 25 26 Palo Alto, CA 94301, (650) 463-4003, and Helen H. Trac, Hogan Lovells, LLP, 3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA 94111,(415) 374-2462, are hereby appointed as counsel for Defendant Joseph Asberry in this matter. The scope of this referral shall be for: 27 all purposes for the duration of the case 28 the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of 1 mediation 2 early neutral evaluation 3 settlement conference 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 briefing and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss): ____________________________________________________________ discovery as follows: ____________________________________________________________ other: ____________________________________________________________ 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: December 6, 2012 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?