United States Of America v. Asberry
Filing
24
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on December 6, 2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No.: 11-cv-6531 JSC
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
v.
15
16
17
JOSEPH N. ASBERRY, a.k.a. JOSEPH
ASBERRY, a.k.a. J.N. ASBERRY,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
Because Defendant Joseph Asberry has requested and is in need of counsel to assist
him in this matter and volunteer attorneys are willing to be appointed to undertake this
representation, Michael L. Charlson, Hogan Lovells, LLP, 525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
22
23
24
25
26
Palo Alto, CA 94301, (650) 463-4003, and Helen H. Trac, Hogan Lovells, LLP, 3
Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500, San Francisco, CA 94111,(415) 374-2462, are hereby
appointed as counsel for Defendant Joseph Asberry in this matter.
The scope of this referral shall be for:
27
all purposes for the duration of the case
28
the limited purpose of representing the litigant in the course of
1
mediation
2
early neutral evaluation
3
settlement conference
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
briefing
and hearing on the following motion (e.g., motion for
summary judgment or motion to dismiss):
____________________________________________________________
discovery as follows:
____________________________________________________________
other:
____________________________________________________________
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: December 6, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?