United States of America v. Cunney

Filing 7

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 5/4/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/20/12. (Attachments: # 1 Cert Serve)(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 7 8 9 Plaintiff(s), ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. GEORGANN K CUNNEY, Defendant(s). ____________________________________/ 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 11-06566 JCS 12 13 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding the possibility 14 of settling this matter not later than April 13, 2012. If the matter is settled, the parties shall notify 15 the Court immediately. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Case Management Conference is scheduled for May 4, 17 2012, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 18 Francisco, California 94102. 19 20 21 The parties shall appear in person or through counsel and shall be prepared to discuss scheduling of future proceedings in this case. A joint case management statement shall be filed no later than seven (7) days prior to the 22 conference, in accordance with Civil Local Rule 16-9. The case management statement shall 23 address the following issues: 24 A. 25 Include a brief statement of the principal facts and events underlying the action. 26 Identify the principal factual and legal issues that the parties dispute. 27 B. 28 Principal Issues Alternative Dispute Resolution and Settlement 1 2 Identify the alternative dispute resolution procedure(s) which the parties intend to use, or report specifically why no such procedure would assist in the resolution of the case. 3 Suggest ways the Court might help with the settlement process. 4 C. 5 Whether the parties will consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge for all purposes. 6 D. 7 Identify any motions whose early resolution would likely have a significant effect on the 8 9 E. For the Northern District of California United States District Court Discovery 1. Describe the discovery each party intends to take and how long discovery is expected to take. No discovery shall be taken until after the conference. 12 13 Motions scope of discovery or other aspects of the case. 10 11 Consent 2. Recommend limitations on discovery and, if appropriate, on subject areas, types of witnesses, and/or time periods to which discovery should be confined. 14 F. 15 State the month and year in which the parties recommend the trial should commence, the 16 17 Trial anticipated length of trial and whether the trial will be before the court or a jury. G. Additional Scheduling 18 1. Recommend time limits to conclude discovery and to hear motions. 19 2. Recommend the date for the pretrial conference and for filing the papers 20 21 required for the pretrial conference. At the time of filing the original with the Clerk’s Office, two conformed copies of all 22 documents shall be delivered directly to chambers on the 15th floor. All documents shall list the 23 civil case number followed by the designation “JCS.” 24 25 26 27 Dated: March 20, 2012 _________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?